Over 0–100 km/h, e-208 156 Phase 2 and 5 E-Tech Electric 150 are neck and neck (8,12 s vs 8,12 s, no significant gap).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | e-208 156 Phase 2 | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.12 s | 8.12 s | Same |
| 400 m standing start | 16.14 s | 16.14 s | Same |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30.57 s | 30.62 s | 0.05 s · e-208 156 Phase 2 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 150 km/h | 150 km/h | Same |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9.33 kg/hp | 10.16 kg/hp | better ratio · e-208 156 Phase 2 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | e-208 156 Phase 2 | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.21 s | 2.07 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3.69 s | 3.46 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6.03 s | 5.85 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.12 s | 8.12 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10.92 s | 11.18 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16.14 s | 16.14 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30.57 s · tight gap | 30.62 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Synchrone a aimants permanents 115 kW |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 455 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the e-208 156 Phase 2 hits 100 km/h in 8.12 s versus 8.12 s for the 5 E-Tech Electric 150. The 0.00 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 is doing 117 km/h against 119 km/h for the e-208 156 Phase 2. The gap is 0.11 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 crosses the line in 16.13 s versus 16.14 s. The 0.01 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory - both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.05 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere - range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the e-208 156 Phase 2 and the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 are governed to 150 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.33 kg/hp vs 10.16 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.23 seconds. The 0.00 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, e-208 156 Phase 2 and 5 E-Tech Electric 150 are neck and neck (8,12 s vs 8,12 s, no significant gap).
e-208 156 Phase 2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e-208 156 Phase 2: 156 hp, ratio 9,33 kg/hp. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp.
e-208 156 Phase 2: 150 km/h. 5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 km/h.