Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (5,55 s vs 5,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | Cayenne E3.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,55 s−0,08 s | 5,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s | 13,87 s+0,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,48 s | 25,36 s+0,12 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 247 km/h+2 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,22 kg/hp | 5,84 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | Cayenne E3.1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,29 s | 1,33 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,16 s | 2,24 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,93 s | 4,02 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,55 s | 5,63 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,61 s | 7,59 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,46 s | 13,19 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,67 s | 23,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s | 13,87 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,48 s | 25,36 stight gap |
| Top speed | 247 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 115 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 985 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
Off the line, the Q7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 5.55 s versus 5.63 s for the Cayenne. The 0.08 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Q7 SUV is doing 131 km/h against 133 km/h for the Cayenne. The gap is 0.05 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q7 SUV crosses the line in 13.87 s versus 13.87 s. The 0.00 s gap represents roughly 0 m of track
Past 400 metres, nothing changes. Same ceiling, same acceleration, same trajectory — both rivals run in formation to the line. The 0.12 s gap at 1,000 metres confirms what the specs already suggested: on track, they’re interchangeable. The real contest happens elsewhere — range, comfort, charging network reliability.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Cayenne at 245 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.22 kg/hp vs 5.84 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.82 seconds. The 0.08 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Q7 SUV gagne (5,55 s vs 5,63 s).
Q7 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,55 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q7 SUV : 340 hp, ratio 6,22 kg/hp. Cayenne E3.1 : 340 hp, ratio 5,84 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV : 247 km/h. Cayenne E3.1 : 245 km/h.