Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 5,74 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne E3.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s−0,11 s | 5,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s−0,20 s | 14,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,36 s−0,46 s | 25,82 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,84 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,75 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne E3.1 | X4 xDrive30d G02 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,38 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,24 s | 2,25 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,02 s | 4,04 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,63 s | 5,74 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,59 s | 7,90 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,19 s | 14,06 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 23,12 s | 24,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,87 s | 14,07 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,36 s | 25,82 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 450 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 985 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 286 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 650 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 930 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the Cayenne hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 5.74 s for the Bmw X4 xDrive30d. The 0.11 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne is doing 133 km/h against 130 km/h for the Bmw X4 xDrive30d. The gap is 0.09 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne crosses the line in 13.87 s versus 14.07 s. The 0.20 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 184 km/h versus 179 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne finishes in 25.36 s versus 25.82 s, with a 0.46 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (245 vs 245 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Cayenne and the Bmw X4 xDrive30d are governed to 245 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.84 kg/hp vs 6.75 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.17 seconds. The 0.11 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne E3.1 wins (5,63 s vs 5,74 s).
Cayenne E3.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,63 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne E3.1: 340 hp, ratio 5,84 kg/hp. X4 xDrive30d G02: 286 hp, ratio 6,75 kg/hp.
Cayenne E3.1: 245 km/h. X4 xDrive30d G02: 245 km/h.