Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV gagne (4,42 s vs 4,75 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Macan Turbo 95B.1 | SQ5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,75 s | 4,42 s+0,33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,99 s | 12,76 s+0,23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,72 s | 23,50 s+0,22 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 254 km/h+4 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Macan Turbo 95B.1 | SQ5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,24 s | 1,06 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,07 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,47 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,75 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,29 s | 6,02 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,64 s | 10,50 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,87 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,99 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,72 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed limited | 254 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp | V6 |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 925 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 4.76 s for the Macan Turbo. At this point, the SQ5 SUV leads by 0.33 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 SUV is doing 142 km/h against 142 km/h for the Macan Turbo. The gap is 0.25 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ5 SUV crosses the line in 12.76 s versus 12.99 s. The 0.23 s gap represents roughly 11 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the SQ5 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 196 km/h versus 195 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ5 SUV finishes in 23.50 s versus 23.72 s, with a 0.22 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (254 vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Macan Turbo is capped at 264 km/h, the SQ5 SUV at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.81 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.18 seconds. The 0.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV gagne (4,42 s vs 4,75 s).
Macan Turbo 95B.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,75 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Macan Turbo 95B.1 : 400 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. SQ5 SUV : 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
Macan Turbo 95B.1 : 254 km/h. SQ5 SUV : 250 km/h.