Macan Turbo
400 hp, 4,7 s 0-100 : among the 7 D-SUV 2013–2017, the Macan Turbo ranks 4th of 7 in 0–100 km/h, 4th of 7 in Top speed, 4th of 7 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
400hp
550 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.7s
VMax 264 km/h
Cons.
12.4L
/100 km
Tank
74.951118L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Macan Turbo
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | V · 6 cyl. · Turbocharged |
| Displacement | 3,604 cm\u00b3 |
| Puissance thermique | 406 hp |
| Combined power | 400 hp |
| Combined torque | 550 Nm |
| Gearbox | DUAL_CLUTCH 7 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | All-wheel-drive, with electronically controlled, map-controlled multi-plate clutch |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 12,4 L/100km |
| Tank | 74.951118 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,7 s |
| VMax | 264 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,699 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,807 mm |
| Width | 1,934 mm |
| Height | 1,609 mm |
| Boot | 18 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,925 kg |
| Cd | 0.37 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 7 D-SUV, the Macan Turbo ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Acceleration: 4.7 s 0-100 (4th of 7 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Macan Turbo ranks 4th of 7 in 0–100 km/h, 0.9 s off the reference Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio (3.8 s).
Top speed: 264 km/h (4th of 7 in Top speed)
Top speed of 264 km/h. The segment reference reaches 283 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the Macan Turbo stands against D-SUV
Comparison across 7 D-SUV marketed between 2013–2017.
0–100 km/h
4eout of 7
Top speed
4eout of 7
Power-to-weight
4eout of 7
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
SQ5 SUV
367 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
SQ5 Sportback
367 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
X4 M40i
360 hp · 0-100 4.8 s
X3 M Competition
510 hp · 0-100 4.1 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Macan 95B.1 range
Generation 95B.1 launched in 2014. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 95B.1
Compare
Popular duels involving the Macan Turbo
Take the next step
Find a Macan Turbo or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Macan Turbo: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 7 D-SUV 2013–2017, the Macan Turbo ranks 4th of 7 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 4th of 7 in Top speed (264 km/h, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio), 4th of 7 in Power-to-weight (208 hp/t, behind the Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio leads in 0–100 km/h (3.8 s vs 4.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Macan Turbo vs Alfa Romeo Stelvio Quadrifoglio duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.