Over 0–100 km/h, Taycan GTS J1.1 and Mustang Mach-E GT are neck and neck (3,65 s vs 3,73 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Taycan GTS J1.1 | Mustang Mach-E GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,65 s−0,08 s | 3,73 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,75 s−0,25 s | 12,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,32 s−1,55 s | 22,87 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+50 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,90 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,33 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Taycan GTS J1.1 | Mustang Mach-E GT |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,00 s | 1,02 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,67 s | 1,70 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,71 s | 2,78 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,65 s | 3,73 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,83 s | 4,94 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,01 s | 8,62 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,49 s | 14,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,75 s | 12,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,32 s | 22,87 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 590 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PSM) |
| Torque | 850 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 303 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed front / Two-speed dog-ring rear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 860 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Taycan GTS hits 100 km/h in 3.65 s versus 3.73 s for the Mustang Mach-E GT. The 0.08 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Taycan GTS is doing 156 km/h against 152 km/h for the Mustang Mach-E GT. The gap is 0.10 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Taycan GTS crosses the line in 11.75 s versus 11.99 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 13 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Taycan GTS continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 219 km/h versus 200 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Taycan GTS finishes in 21.32 s versus 22.87 s, with a 1.55 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Taycan GTS is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the Mustang Mach-E GT at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.90 kg/hp vs 4.33 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.69 seconds. The 0.08 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Taycan GTS J1.1 and Mustang Mach-E GT are neck and neck (3,65 s vs 3,73 s, no significant gap).
Taycan GTS J1.1 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,65 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Taycan GTS J1.1: 590 hp, ratio 3,90 kg/hp. Mustang Mach-E GT: 487 hp, ratio 4,33 kg/hp.
Taycan GTS J1.1: 250 km/h. Mustang Mach-E GT: 200 km/h.