Sur 0–100 km/h, Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo J1.1 gagne (2,83 s vs 3,34 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo J1.1 | RS e-tron GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,83 s−0,51 s | 3,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,77 s−0,40 s | 11,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,82 s−0,45 s | 20,27 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,25 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo J1.1 | RS e-tron GT |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,81 s | 0,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,36 s | 1,64 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,17 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,83 s | 3,34 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,77 s | 4,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,29 s | 6,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 9,80 s | 10,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,77 s | 11,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,82 s | 20,27 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 750 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (PSM) |
| Torque | 1050 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 370 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed front / Two-speed dog-ring rear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 738 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo hits 100 km/h in 2.83 s versus 3.34 s for the RS e-tron GT. At this point, the Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo leads by 0.51 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo is doing 169 km/h against 167 km/h for the RS e-tron GT. The gap is 0.36 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo crosses the line in 10.77 s versus 11.17 s. The 0.40 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 236 km/h versus 233 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo finishes in 19.81 s versus 20.27 s, with a 0.46 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo and the RS e-tron GT are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 3.25 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.78 seconds. The 0.51 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo J1.1 gagne (2,83 s vs 3,34 s).
Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo J1.1 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 2,83 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo J1.1 : 750 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. RS e-tron GT : 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp.
Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo J1.1 : 250 km/h. RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h.