Over 0–100 km/h, 5 E-Tech Electric 150 wins (8,12 s vs 8,57 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,12 s−0,45 s | 8,57 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,14 s−0,25 s | 16,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30,62 s | 29,52 s+1,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 150 km/h | 205 km/h−55 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,16 kg/hp | 9,03 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,26 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,77 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,85 s | 6,26 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,12 s | 8,57 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,18 s | 11,51 s |
| 0–160 km/h | - | 21,07 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 45,66 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,14 s | 16,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30,62 s | 29,52 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 205 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | E3 |
| Torque | 230 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 228 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | e-DCS6 6-speed electrified dual clutch |
Off the line, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 hits 100 km/h in 8.12 s versus 8.57 s for the C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6. At this point, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 leads by 0.45 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 is doing 117 km/h against 116 km/h for the C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6. The gap is 0.31 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 crosses the line in 16.13 s versus 16.38 s. The 0.25 s gap represents roughly 10 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The 5 E-Tech Electric 150 maxes out at 150 km/h while the C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 keeps accelerating towards 205 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.09 s.
Around 652 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 55 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 finishes in 29.52 s versus 30.62 s. The 1.10 s delta in favour of the C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 is capped at 150 km/h, the C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6 at 205 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.16 kg/hp vs 9.03 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.29 seconds. The 0.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 5 E-Tech Electric 150 wins (8,12 s vs 8,57 s).
5 E-Tech Electric 150 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp. C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6: 136 hp, ratio 9,03 kg/hp.
5 E-Tech Electric 150: 150 km/h. C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6: 205 km/h.