Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AAustralvsBArkanaHybrid
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsAustral · Arkana

Renault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 vs Renault Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2022 vs 2021 · Methodology
RenaultHybridFaster

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

200 hp · 300 Nm · 1,639 kg · 2022

VS
RenaultHybrid

Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145

143 hp · 205 Nm · 1,528 kg · 2021

Result · 0–100 km/h

ARenault Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

8.29 s

Gap2.35 sin favour of Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
BRenault Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145

10.64 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureAustral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145Gap
0–100 km/h8.29 s10.64 s2.35 s · Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
400 m standing start16.16 s17.87 s1.71 s · Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
1,000 m standing start28.80 s31.99 s3.19 s · Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
Top speed (electronically limited)180 km/h175 km/h5 km/h · Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
Power-to-weight ratio8.20 kg/hp10.69 kg/hpbetter ratio · Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

RenaultHybridAustral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
RenaultHybridArkana E-Tech Hybrid 145
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageAustral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145
0–30 km/h2.32 s2.93 s
0–50 km/h3.87 s4.42 s
0–80 km/h6.21 s7.63 s
0–100 km/h8.29 s10.64 s
0–120 km/h10.88 s14.50 s
0–160 km/h18.55 s27.54 s
400 m standing start16.16 s17.87 s
1,000 m standing start28.80 s31.99 s
Top speed180 km/h175 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Renault

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

8,20kg/hpratio better by 2,49 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power200 hpInline-3 Turbo E-Tech (H5F 130)
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 639 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxMulti-mode automatic (E-Tech)
Renault

Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145

10,69kg/hpcompensated by −111 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power143 hpInline-4 Atkinson cycle E-Tech (HR16)
Torque205 Nm
Weight1 528 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxMulti-mode automatic (E-Tech)

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 hits 100 km/h in 8.29 s versus 10.64 s for the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145. At this point, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 leads by 2.35 s and sits roughly 20 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 is doing 120 km/h against 107 km/h for the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145. The gap is 1.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 crosses the line in 16.16 s versus 17.87 s. The 1.71 s gap represents roughly 62 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 168 km/h versus 149 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 finishes in 28.80 s versus 31.99 s, with a 3.19 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (180 vs 175 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 is capped at 180 km/h, the Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 at 175 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.20 kg/hp vs 10.69 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 16.93 seconds. The 2.35 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200
Kia Niro HEV FWD

Other duels you might be interested in

RenaultVSJeep

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 vs Compass 4xe

RenaultVSKia

Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 vs Niro HEV FWD

BMWVSRenault

X1 xDrive25e vs Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200

RenaultVSBMW

Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145 vs X1 sDrive18i

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 wins (8,29 s vs 10,64 s).

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,29 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200: 200 hp, ratio 8,20 kg/hp. Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145: 143 hp, ratio 10,69 kg/hp.

Austral E-Tech Full Hybrid 200: 180 km/h. Arkana E-Tech Hybrid 145: 175 km/h.