Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Hatchbacks
AClio 6HybridvsB3Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsClio 6 · 3

Renault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 vs DS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

city car · 2025 vs 2020 · Methodology
RenaultHybridFaster

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

160 hp · 205 Nm · 1,370 kg · 2025

VS
DSPetrol

3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8

156 hp · 240 Nm · 1,230 kg · 2020

Result · 0–100 km/h

ARenault Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

8.73 s

Gap0.27 sin favour of Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
BDS3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8

9.00 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureClio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 1603 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8Gap
0–100 km/h8.73 s9.00 s0.27 s · Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
400 m standing start16.40 s16.76 s0.36 s · Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
1,000 m standing start29.70 s29.60 s0.10 s · 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
Top speed (electronically limited)180 km/h214 km/h34 km/h · 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
Power-to-weight ratio8.56 kg/hp7.88 kg/hpbetter ratio · 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

RenaultHybridClio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
DSPetrol3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageClio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 1603 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8
0–30 km/h2.06 s2.63 s
0–50 km/h3.45 s4.42 s
0–80 km/h6.07 s6.95 s
0–100 km/h8.73 s9.00 s
0–120 km/h11.64 s · tight gap11.79 s
0–160 km/h22.08 s20.22 s
0–200 km/h-41.14 s
400 m standing start16.40 s16.76 s
1,000 m standing start29.70 s29.60 s · tight gap
Top speed180 km/h214 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Renault

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160

8,56kg/hpcompensated by −140 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power160 hpE4
Torque205 Nm
Weight1 370 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxE-Tech Multi-Mode dog-clutch (ICE: 4-speed, EV: 2-speed)
DS

3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8

7,88kg/hpratio better by 0,68 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power156 hpPending
Torque240 Nm
Weight1 230 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox8-speed automatic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 hits 100 km/h in 8.73 s versus 9.00 s for the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8. At this point, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 leads by 0.27 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 is doing 114 km/h against 118 km/h for the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8. The gap is 0.55 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.

At 400 metres standing start, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 crosses the line in 16.39 s versus 16.76 s. The 0.36 s gap represents roughly 15 m of track - two to three car lengths.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 maxes out at 180 km/h while the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 keeps accelerating towards 214 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.14 s.

Around 777 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 34 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 finishes in 29.59 s versus 29.70 s. The 0.10 s delta shows an extremely tight race.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Electronically capped at 180 km/h, the Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.56 kg/hp vs 7.88 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.81 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

RenaultVSPeugeot

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 vs 208 Hybrid 145 e-DCS6

DS3VSMINI

Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 vs Cooper C FWD

RenaultVSCitroen

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 vs C3 Hybrid 136 e-DCS6

DS3VSAudi

Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 vs A1 allstreet 35 TFSI S tronic 110 kW

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 wins (8,73 s vs 9,00 s).

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,73 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: 160 hp, ratio 8,56 kg/hp. 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: 156 hp, ratio 7,88 kg/hp.

Clio 6 E-Tech Full Hybrid 160: 180 km/h. 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: 214 km/h.