Sur 0–100 km/h, Megane E-Tech Electric gagne (7,48 s vs 9,44 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Megane E-Tech Electric | Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,48 s−1,96 s | 9,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,59 s−1,49 s | 17,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,16 s−3,38 s | 32,54 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h+20 km/h | 140 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,11 kg/hpbetter ratio | 11,04 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Megane E-Tech Electric | Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,38 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,99 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,62 s | 6,76 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,48 s | 9,44 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,92 s | 13,10 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,05 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,59 s | 17,08 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,16 s | 32,54 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 140 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 768 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor (R135) |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 502 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed reducer (BEV) |
Off the line, the Megane E-Tech Electric hits 100 km/h in 7.48 s versus 9.44 s for the Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50. At this point, the Megane E-Tech Electric leads by 1.96 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Megane E-Tech Electric is doing 123 km/h against 111 km/h for the Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50. The gap is 0.92 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Megane E-Tech Electric crosses the line in 15.59 s versus 17.08 s. The 1.49 s gap represents roughly 55 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Megane E-Tech Electric continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 140 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Megane E-Tech Electric finishes in 29.16 s versus 32.53 s, with a 3.37 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Megane E-Tech Electric is capped at 160 km/h, the Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 at 140 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.11 kg/hp vs 11.04 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 15.57 seconds. The 1.96 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Megane E-Tech Electric gagne (7,48 s vs 9,44 s).
Megane E-Tech Electric passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,48 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Megane E-Tech Electric : 218 hp, ratio 8,11 kg/hp. Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 : 136 hp, ratio 11,04 kg/hp.
Megane E-Tech Electric : 160 km/h. Zoe R135 E-Tech Z.E.50 : 140 km/h.