Sur 0–100 km/h, Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 gagne (8,05 s vs 8,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | E-PACE P200 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s−0,30 s | 8,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s−0,13 s | 16,19 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s−0,43 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 233 km/h+18 km/h | 215 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,12 kg/hp | 8,74 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,24 s | 1,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,75 s | 3,33 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,07 s | 5,88 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,66 s | 11,44 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,80 s | 21,17 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 38,38 s | 45,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s | 16,19 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 233 km/h | 215 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 989 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 320 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 748 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 9-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 hits 100 km/h in 8.05 s versus 8.35 s for the E-PACE P200. The instant torque of 300 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. Despite the faster sprint time, the E-PACE P200 is 6 m further along the track at this moment: stronger low-speed acceleration offsets a slower run beyond 100 km/h.
At 200 metres, the E-PACE P200 is doing 115 km/h against 120 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap is 0.09 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 crosses the line in 16.06 s versus 16.19 s. The 0.13 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 163 km/h versus 159 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 finishes in 28.98 s versus 29.41 s, with a 0.43 s lead.
Electronically capped at 215 km/h, the E-PACE P200 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.46 seconds. The 0.30 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 gagne (8,05 s vs 8,35 s).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,05 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 : 218 hp, ratio 9,12 kg/hp. E-PACE P200 : 200 hp, ratio 8,74 kg/hp.
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 : 233 km/h. E-PACE P200 : 215 km/h.