Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro wins (7,35 s vs 8,05 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | ID.3 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s | 7,35 s+0,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s | 15,50 s+0,56 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s−0,15 s | 29,13 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 233 km/h+73 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,12 kg/hp | 8,82 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 | ID.3 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,24 s | 1,88 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,75 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,07 s | 5,31 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,05 s | 7,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,66 s | 10,01 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,80 s | 18,97 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 38,38 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16,06 s | 15,50 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,98 s | 29,13 stight gap |
| Top speed | 233 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 218 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 989 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 800 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ID.3 Pro hits 100 km/h in 7.35 s versus 8.05 s for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. At this point, the ID.3 Pro leads by 0.70 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ID.3 Pro is doing 121 km/h against 120 km/h for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap is 0.54 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.3 Pro crosses the line in 15.50 s versus 16.06 s. The 0.56 s gap represents roughly 23 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The ID.3 Pro maxes out at 160 km/h while the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 keeps accelerating towards 233 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.57 s.
Around 946 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 73 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 finishes in 28.98 s versus 29.13 s. The 0.15 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Electronically capped at 160 km/h, the ID.3 Pro never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.12 kg/hp vs 8.82 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.36 seconds. The 0.70 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro wins (7,35 s vs 8,05 s).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 218 hp, ratio 9,12 kg/hp. ID.3 Pro: 204 hp, ratio 8,82 kg/hp.
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220: 233 km/h. ID.3 Pro: 160 km/h.