Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,29 s vs 6,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model 3 Performance | ID.4 GTX | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,29 s−2,86 s | 6,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,49 s−2,99 s | 14,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,21 s−5,63 s | 26,84 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 261 km/h+81 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,33 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model 3 Performance | ID.4 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,89 s | 1,58 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,49 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,44 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,29 s | 6,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,37 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,66 s | 15,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,53 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 11,49 s | 14,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,21 s | 26,84 s |
| Top speed | 261 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 456 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 698 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 836 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 193 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model 3 Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.29 s versus 6.15 s for the ID.4 GTX. At this point, the Model 3 Performance leads by 2.86 s and sits roughly 21 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model 3 Performance is doing 157 km/h against 128 km/h for the ID.4 GTX. The gap is 2.06 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model 3 Performance crosses the line in 11.49 s versus 14.48 s. The 2.99 s gap represents roughly 124 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model 3 Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 216 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model 3 Performance finishes in 21.21 s versus 26.83 s, with a 5.62 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model 3 Performance is capped at 261 km/h, the ID.4 GTX at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.03 kg/hp vs 7.33 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.71 seconds. The 2.86 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model 3 Performance wins (3,29 s vs 6,15 s).
Model 3 Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,29 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model 3 Performance: 456 hp, ratio 4,03 kg/hp. ID.4 GTX: 299 hp, ratio 7,33 kg/hp.
Model 3 Performance: 261 km/h. ID.4 GTX: 180 km/h.