Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S P100D gagne (2,85 s vs 3,34 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model S P100D | RS e-tron GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,85 s−0,49 s | 3,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,63 s−0,54 s | 11,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,59 s−0,68 s | 20,27 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,94 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,25 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model S P100D | RS e-tron GT |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,83 s | 0,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,64 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,22 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,85 s | 3,34 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,65 s | 4,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,99 s | 6,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 9,28 s | 10,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,63 s | 11,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,59 s | 20,27 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 762 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 967 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 241 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 738 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Model S P100D hits 100 km/h in 2.85 s versus 3.34 s for the RS e-tron GT. At this point, the Model S P100D leads by 0.49 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model S P100D is doing 173 km/h against 167 km/h for the RS e-tron GT. The gap is 0.42 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S P100D crosses the line in 10.63 s versus 11.17 s. The 0.54 s gap represents roughly 31 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model S P100D continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 240 km/h versus 233 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S P100D finishes in 19.59 s versus 20.27 s, with a 0.68 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Model S P100D and the RS e-tron GT are governed to 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.94 kg/hp vs 3.25 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.78 seconds. The 0.49 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S P100D gagne (2,85 s vs 3,34 s).
Model S P100D passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 2,85 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model S P100D : 762 hp, ratio 2,94 kg/hp. RS e-tron GT : 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp.
Model S P100D : 250 km/h. RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h.