Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Performance gagne (2,53 s vs 3,34 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Model S Performance | RS e-tron GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 2,53 s−0,81 s | 3,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,32 s−0,85 s | 11,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,02 s−1,25 s | 20,27 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h+12 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 2,89 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,25 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Model S Performance | RS e-tron GT |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,71 s | 0,98 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,18 s | 1,64 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 1,91 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 2,53 s | 3,34 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3,31 s | 4,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 5,58 s | 6,79 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 8,76 s | 10,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10,32 s | 11,17 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19,02 s | 20,27 s |
| Top speed limited | 262 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 250 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 738 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 395 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Model S Performance hits 100 km/h in 2.53 s versus 3.34 s for the RS e-tron GT. At this point, the Model S Performance leads by 0.81 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model S Performance is doing 175 km/h against 167 km/h for the RS e-tron GT. The gap is 0.69 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Performance crosses the line in 10.31 s versus 11.17 s. The 0.85 s gap represents roughly 48 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model S Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 244 km/h versus 233 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Performance finishes in 19.02 s versus 20.27 s, with a 1.25 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (262 vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model S Performance is capped at 262 km/h, the RS e-tron GT at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (2.89 kg/hp vs 3.25 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Unknown).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 4.78 seconds. The 0.81 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Performance gagne (2,53 s vs 3,34 s).
Model S Performance passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 2,53 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Model S Performance : 778 hp, ratio 2,89 kg/hp. RS e-tron GT : 738 hp, ratio 3,25 kg/hp.
Model S Performance : 262 km/h. RS e-tron GT : 250 km/h.