Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AModelvsBEX40BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · EX40

Tesla Model X Long Range vs Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

large SUV · 2022 vs 2024 · Methodology
TeslaBEVFaster

Model X Long Range

670 hp · 660 Nm · 2,352 kg · 2022

VS
VolvoBEV

EX40 Twin Motor AWD

408 hp · 670 Nm · 2,110 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

ATesla Model X Long Range

4.11 s

Gap0.82 sin favour of Model X Long Range
BVolvo EX40 Twin Motor AWD

4.92 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel X Long RangeEX40 Twin Motor AWDGap
0–100 km/h4.11 s4.92 s0.82 s · Model X Long Range
400 m standing start11.93 s13.15 s1.22 s · Model X Long Range
1,000 m standing start21.31 s25.14 s3.83 s · Model X Long Range
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h180 km/h70 km/h · Model X Long Range
Power-to-weight ratio3.51 kg/hp5.17 kg/hpbetter ratio · Model X Long Range

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

TeslaBEVModel X Long Range
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
VolvoBEVEX40 Twin Motor AWD
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageModel X Long RangeEX40 Twin Motor AWD
0–30 km/h1.23 s1.60 s
0–50 km/h2.04 s2.47 s
0–80 km/h3.27 s3.74 s
0–100 km/h4.11 s4.92 s
0–120 km/h5.06 s6.42 s
0–160 km/h7.91 s10.52 s
0–200 km/h12.04 s-
400 m standing start11.93 s13.15 s
1,000 m standing start21.31 s25.14 s
Top speed limited250 km/h180 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Tesla

Model X Long Range

3,51kg/hpratio better by 1,66 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power670 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque660 Nm
Weight2 352 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Volvo

EX40 Twin Motor AWD

5,17kg/hpcompensated by −242 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power408 hpPending
Torque670 Nm
Weight2 110 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearboxsingle-speed reduction AWD

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model X Long Range hits 100 km/h in 4.11 s versus 4.93 s for the EX40 Twin Motor AWD. At this point, the Model X Long Range leads by 0.82 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model X Long Range is doing 160 km/h against 144 km/h for the EX40 Twin Motor AWD. The gap is 0.78 s. The gap remains stable from the start.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Long Range crosses the line in 11.92 s versus 13.14 s. The 1.22 s gap represents roughly 59 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Model X Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 180 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Long Range finishes in 21.31 s versus 25.14 s, with a 3.83 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Model X Long Range is capped at 249 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the EX40 Twin Motor AWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.51 kg/hp vs 5.17 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.30 seconds. The 0.82 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of EX40 Twin Motor AWD
BMW iX xDrive50BMW iX xDrive40

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSBMW

Model X Long Range vs iX xDrive50

VolvoVSAudi

EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Q4 Sportback 55 e-tron quattro 250 kW

TeslaVSBMW

Model X Long Range vs iX xDrive40

VolvoVSAudi

EX40 Twin Motor AWD vs Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Long Range wins (4,11 s vs 4,92 s).

Model X Long Range goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,11 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Model X Long Range: 670 hp, ratio 3,51 kg/hp. EX40 Twin Motor AWD: 408 hp, ratio 5,17 kg/hp.

Model X Long Range: 250 km/h. EX40 Twin Motor AWD: 180 km/h.