Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 8,36 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | Model X Performance | 9 E-Tense 250 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3.05 s | 8.36 s | 5.31 s · Model X Performance |
| 400 m standing start | 10.92 s | 16.22 s | 5.30 s · Model X Performance |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19.92 s | 28.57 s | 8.65 s · Model X Performance |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 262 km/h | 235 km/h | 27 km/h · Model X Performance |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.16 kg/hp | 7.51 kg/hp | better ratio · Model X Performance |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | Model X Performance | 9 E-Tense 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0.89 s | 2.40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.48 s | 4.01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2.37 s | 6.47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3.05 s | 8.36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 3.91 s | 10.88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6.45 s | 18.12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10.08 s | 31.70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 10.92 s | 16.22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 19.92 s | 28.57 s |
| Top speed | 262 km/h | 235 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 778 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 1139 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 459 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Model X Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.05 s versus 8.36 s for the 9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the Model X Performance leads by 5.31 s and sits roughly 27 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model X Performance is doing 168 km/h against 121 km/h for the 9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 3.87 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model X Performance crosses the line in 10.92 s versus 16.22 s. The 5.30 s gap represents roughly 202 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Model X Performance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 233 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model X Performance finishes in 19.92 s versus 28.57 s, with a 8.65 s lead.
Electronically capped at 262 km/h, the Model X Performance never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.16 kg/hp vs 7.51 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 5.31 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Model X Performance wins (3,05 s vs 8,36 s).
Model X Performance goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,05 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Model X Performance: 778 hp, ratio 3,16 kg/hp. 9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.
Model X Performance: 262 km/h. 9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h.