Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro wins (7,35 s vs 13,48 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| ID.3 Pro | Spring Electric 65 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,35 s−6,13 s | 13,48 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,50 s−3,96 s | 19,46 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,13 s−7,67 s | 36,80 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h+35 km/h | 125 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,82 kg/hpbetter ratio | 15,14 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | ID.3 Pro | Spring Electric 65 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,88 s | 3,12 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,15 s | 5,23 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,31 s | 9,27 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,35 s | 13,48 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,01 s | 19,85 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,97 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,50 s | 19,46 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,13 s | 36,80 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 125 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 800 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 65 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor 48 kW |
| Torque | 113 Nm | |
| Weight | 984 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ID.3 Pro hits 100 km/h in 7.35 s versus 13.48 s for the Spring Electric 65. At this point, the ID.3 Pro leads by 6.13 s and sits roughly 41 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ID.3 Pro is doing 121 km/h against 97 km/h for the Spring Electric 65. The gap is 2.68 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.3 Pro crosses the line in 15.50 s versus 19.46 s. The 3.96 s gap represents roughly 125 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the ID.3 Pro continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 125 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the ID.3 Pro finishes in 29.13 s versus 36.79 s, with a 7.67 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the ID.3 Pro is capped at 160 km/h, the Spring Electric 65 at 125 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.82 kg/hp vs 15.14 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, ID.3 Pro wins (7,35 s vs 13,48 s).
ID.3 Pro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,35 seconds (calibrated simulation).
ID.3 Pro: 204 hp, ratio 8,82 kg/hp. Spring Electric 65: 65 hp, ratio 15,14 kg/hp.
ID.3 Pro: 160 km/h. Spring Electric 65: 125 km/h.