Over 0–100 km/h, Born wins (7,23 s vs 7,88 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| ID.3 Pro S | Born | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,88 s | 7,23 s+0,65 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,92 s | 15,39 s+0,53 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,62 s | 28,98 s+0,64 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,46 kg/hp | 8,51 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | ID.3 Pro S | Born |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,02 s | 1,88 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,38 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,70 s | 5,26 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,88 s | 7,23 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,75 s | 9,79 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,40 s | 18,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,92 s | 15,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,62 s | 28,98 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 930 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 710 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Born hits 100 km/h in 7.23 s versus 7.88 s for the ID.3 Pro S. At this point, the Born leads by 0.65 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Born is doing 122 km/h against 118 km/h for the ID.3 Pro S. The gap is 0.35 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Born crosses the line in 15.39 s versus 15.91 s. The 0.52 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Born continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 160 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Born finishes in 28.98 s versus 29.62 s, with a 0.64 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 160 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the ID.3 Pro S and the Born are governed to 160 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.46 kg/hp vs 8.51 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.58 seconds. The 0.65 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Born wins (7,23 s vs 7,88 s).
ID.3 Pro S goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,88 seconds (calibrated simulation).
ID.3 Pro S: 204 hp, ratio 9,46 kg/hp. Born: 201 hp, ratio 8,51 kg/hp.
ID.3 Pro S: 160 km/h. Born: 160 km/h.