Sur 0–100 km/h, XC60 T8 AWD Recharge gagne (4,92 s vs 5,37 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| XC60 T8 AWD Recharge | F-PACE P400e | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,92 s−0,45 s | 5,37 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,99 s−0,61 s | 13,60 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,99 s | 24,60 s+0,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 220 km/h−40 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,45 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,55 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | XC60 T8 AWD Recharge | F-PACE P400e |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,40 s | 1,40 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,34 s | 2,33 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,81 s | 3,92 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,92 s | 5,37 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,38 s | 7,10 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,11 s | 12,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 19,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,99 s | 13,60 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,99 s | 24,60 s |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 220 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 461 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 709 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 050 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 404 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 640 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 243 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-PACE P400e 2021 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the XC60 T8 AWD Recharge hits 100 km/h in 4.93 s versus 5.37 s for the F-PACE P400e. At this point, the XC60 T8 AWD Recharge leads by 0.45 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the XC60 T8 AWD Recharge is doing 147 km/h against 137 km/h for the F-PACE P400e. The gap is 0.30 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the XC60 T8 AWD Recharge crosses the line in 12.99 s versus 13.60 s. The 0.61 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The XC60 T8 AWD Recharge maxes out at 180 km/h while the F-PACE P400e keeps accelerating towards 220 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.58 s.
Around 877 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the F-PACE P400e overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 40 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the F-PACE P400e finishes in 24.60 s versus 24.98 s. The 0.39 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the XC60 T8 AWD Recharge is capped at 180 km/h, the F-PACE P400e at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.45 kg/hp vs 5.55 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.18 seconds. The 0.45 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, XC60 T8 AWD Recharge gagne (4,92 s vs 5,37 s).
XC60 T8 AWD Recharge passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,92 secondes (simulation calibrée).
XC60 T8 AWD Recharge : 461 hp, ratio 4,45 kg/hp. F-PACE P400e : 404 hp, ratio 5,55 kg/hp.
XC60 T8 AWD Recharge : 180 km/h. F-PACE P400e : 220 km/h.