Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 8,51 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | G9 | 4 Long Range RWD | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8.51 s | 6.73 s | 1.78 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 400 m standing start | 16.32 s | 14.92 s | 1.40 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.71 s | 27.24 s | 1.47 s · 4 Long Range RWD |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 180 km/h | 20 km/h · G9 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7.18 kg/hp | 7.00 kg/hp | better ratio · 4 Long Range RWD |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | G9 | 4 Long Range RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2.41 s | 1.92 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4.03 s | 3.21 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6.49 s | 5.16 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8.51 s | 6.73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11.09 s | 8.78 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18.51 s | 15.38 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31.05 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16.32 s | 14.92 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28.71 s | 27.24 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 180 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 308 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 210 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 245 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 715 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the 4 Long Range RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.73 s versus 8.51 s for the G9. At this point, the 4 Long Range RWD leads by 1.78 s and sits roughly 19 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD is doing 129 km/h against 120 km/h for the G9. The gap is 1.08 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 4 Long Range RWD crosses the line in 14.92 s versus 16.32 s. The 1.40 s gap represents roughly 57 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 176 km/h versus 169 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 4 Long Range RWD finishes in 27.23 s versus 28.71 s, with a 1.48 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (200 km/h), the G9 never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the G9 is capped at 200 km/h, the 4 Long Range RWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.18 kg/hp vs 7.00 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.63 seconds. The 1.78 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, 4 Long Range RWD wins (6,73 s vs 8,51 s).
G9 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,51 seconds (calibrated simulation).
G9: 308 hp, ratio 7,18 kg/hp. 4 Long Range RWD: 245 hp, ratio 7,00 kg/hp.
G9: 200 km/h. 4 Long Range RWD: 180 km/h.