Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 6,71 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| P7 | Explorer EcoBoost 300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s−2,50 s | 6,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s−2,38 s | 14,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s−1,85 s | 27,10 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 170 km/h | 220 km/h−50 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio | 6,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | P7 | Explorer EcoBoost 300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,11 s | 1,82 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,85 s | 3,04 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,09 s | 4,96 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,21 s | 6,71 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,64 s | 8,99 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,67 s | 15,83 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 30,71 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,55 s | 14,93 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,25 s | 27,10 s |
| Top speed | 170 km/h | 220 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 305 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 043 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 10-speed torque-converter automatic |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 6.71 s for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The instant torque of 655 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the P7 leads by 2.50 s and sits roughly 23 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 127 km/h for the Explorer EcoBoost 300. The gap is 1.74 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 12.54 s versus 14.92 s. The 2.38 s gap represents roughly 99 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The P7 maxes out at 170 km/h while the Explorer EcoBoost 300 keeps accelerating towards 220 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 2.50 s from 2.38 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the P7 finishes in 25.24 s versus 27.09 s, with just 1.85 s to spare. The Explorer EcoBoost 300 fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the P7 is capped at 170 km/h, the Explorer EcoBoost 300 at 220 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.35 seconds. The 2.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 6,71 s).
P7 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,21 seconds (calibrated simulation).
P7: 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp. Explorer EcoBoost 300: 305 hp, ratio 6,70 kg/hp.
P7: 170 km/h. Explorer EcoBoost 300: 220 km/h.