Sur 0–100 km/h, X9 gagne (3,88 s vs 6,83 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X9 | 225xe Active Tourer F44 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s−2,95 s | 6,83 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,34 s−3,64 s | 14,98 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s−5,03 s | 27,17 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h | 202 km/h−2 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,84 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,66 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X9 | 225xe Active Tourer F44 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,15 s | 1,71 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,92 s | 2,85 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,09 s | 4,87 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,88 s | 6,83 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,68 s | 9,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,72 s | 16,29 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 9,78 s | 29,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,34 s | 14,98 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s | 27,17 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 202 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 543 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor AWD MPV |
| Torque | 717 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 630 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp | 3 cyl |
| Torque | 385 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 685 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the X9 hits 100 km/h in 3.88 s versus 6.83 s for the Bmw 225xe Active Tourer. At this point, the X9 leads by 2.95 s and sits roughly 18 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X9 is doing 173 km/h against 124 km/h for the Bmw 225xe Active Tourer. The gap is 2.23 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X9 crosses the line in 11.34 s versus 14.97 s. The 3.63 s gap represents roughly 146 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X9 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 172 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X9 finishes in 22.13 s versus 27.17 s, with a 5.03 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (200 vs 202 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the X9 and the Bmw 225xe Active Tourer are governed to 200 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.84 kg/hp vs 7.66 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.70 seconds. The 2.95 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, X9 gagne (3,88 s vs 6,83 s).
X9 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,88 secondes (simulation calibrée).
X9 : 543 hp, ratio 4,84 kg/hp. 225xe Active Tourer F44 : 220 hp, ratio 7,66 kg/hp.
X9 : 200 km/h. 225xe Active Tourer F44 : 202 km/h.