F-150 EcoBoost 400
405 hp, 6,1 s 0-100 : among the 5 LCV 2019–2023, the F-150 EcoBoost 400 ranks 3rd of 5 in Combined consumption, 4th of 5 in Tank range, 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
405hp
678 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
6.1s
VMax 180 km/h
Cons.
11.8L
/100 km
Tank
98L
On this page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Ford F-150 EcoBoost 400
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Power | 405 hp |
| Couple | 678 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 10 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11,8 L/100km |
| Tank | 98 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 6,1 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Width | 2,004 mm |
| Height | 1,918 mm |
| Kerb weight | 2,268 kg |
| Cd | 0.44 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 5 LCV, the F-150 EcoBoost 400 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Fuel consumption: 11.8 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 5 in Combined consumption)
The F-150 EcoBoost 400 consumes 11.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170 (7.5 L/100).
Tank range: 831 km (4th of 5 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the F-150 EcoBoost 400 covers 831 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1067 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the F-150 EcoBoost 400 stands against LCV
Comparison across 5 LCV marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption
3eout of 5
Tank range
4eout of 5
0–100 km/h
3eout of 5
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Take the next step
Find a F-150 EcoBoost 400 or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Ford F-150 EcoBoost 400: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 5 LCV 2019–2023, the F-150 EcoBoost 400 ranks 3rd of 5 in Combined consumption (11.8 L/100, behind the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170), 4th of 5 in Tank range (831 km, behind the Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170), 3rd of 5 in 0–100 km/h (6.1 s, behind the Ford F-150 Raptor EcoBoost 450).
831 km on a full tank (11.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 4th of 5 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170 leads in Combined consumption (7.5 L/100 vs 11.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the F-150 EcoBoost 400 vs Ford Ranger EcoBlue 170 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.