III · GENERATION 2023 · CITY CAR
HyundaiICE

i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT)

84 hp, 12,6 s 0-100 : among the 11 city cars 2021–2025, the i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT) ranks 4th of 11 in Combined consumption, 4th of 11 in Tank range, 4th of 11 in 0–100 km/h, behind the only Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT). Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,66715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

84hp

118 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

12.6s

VMax 171 km/h

Cons.

5.5L

/100 km

Tank

40L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Hyundai i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT)

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,197 cm³
Power84 hp
Couple118 Nm
TransmissionTraction

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.5 L/100km
Tank40 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h12,6 s
VMax171 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length3,675 mm
Wheelbase2,425 mm
Width1,680 mm
Height1,483 mm
Boot252 L
Kerb weight932 kg
CO₂ WLTP126 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 11 city cars, the i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT) ranks (top 4 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 4th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100), 4th of 11 in Tank range (727 km), 4th of 11 in 0–100 km/h (12.6 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT) (1st with 5.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT) (1st with 741 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (4th of 11 in Combined consumption)

The i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT) consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT) (5.4 L/100).

Tank range: 727 km (4th of 11 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT) covers 727 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 741 km.

Segment positioning

Where the i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT) stands against city cars

Comparison across 11 city cars marketed between 2021–2025.

Combined consumption4e / 11
5.5 L/100
Min 5.9 L/100 · Hyundai i10 1.2 MPi 4 Seater (5AMT)Max 5.4 L/100 · Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT)
Tank range4e / 11
727 km
Min 678 km · Hyundai i10 1.2 MPi 4 Seater (5AMT)Max 741 km · Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT)
0–100 km/h4e / 11
12,6 s
Min 17,8 s · Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 5 Seater (5AMT)Max 10,5 s · Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT)

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Hyundai i10 III range

Generation III launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the III

Compare

Popular duels involving the i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT)

Frequently asked questions

Hyundai i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT): what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 11 city cars 2021–2025, the i10 1.2 MPi 5 Seater (5MT) ranks 4th of 11 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT)), 4th of 11 in Tank range (727 km, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT)), 4th of 11 in 0–100 km/h (12.6 s, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 4 Seater (5MT)).

727 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 4th of 11 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.