i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS
67 hp, 14,8 s 0-100 : among the 4 city cars 2017–2021, the i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
67hp
96 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
14.8s
VMax 156 km/h
Cons.
5.4L
/100 km
Tank
40L
Sur cette page
Technical identity card
Full specifications Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown · 3 cyl. |
| Displacement | 998 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 67 hp |
| Couple | 96 Nm |
| Transmission | FWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 5,4 L/100km |
| Tank | 40 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 14,8 s |
| VMax | 156 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 3,670 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,425 mm |
| Width | 1,680 mm |
| Height | 1,480 mm |
| Boot | 252 L |
| Kerb weight | 921 kg |
| CO₂ WLTP | 122 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 4 city cars, the i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. Combined consumption (5.4 L/100), Tank range (741 km), 0–100 km/h (14.8 s).
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 100 PS (1st with 12.6 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.4 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS consumes 5.4 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS (5.4 L/100).
Tank range: 741 km (Tank range)
On a full tank, the i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS covers 741 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 741 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Duel against a rival
Calibrated drag race, speed stages, comparative technical analysis.
Start a duel →Segment positioning
Where the i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS stands against city cars
Comparison across 4 city cars marketed between 2017–2021.
Combined consumption
1eout of 4
Tank range
1eout of 4
0–100 km/h
2eout of 4
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Panda 1.2 8v 69
69 hp · 0-100 14.1 s
500 1.2 8v 69
69 hp · 0-100 14.8 s
500 1.0 Hybrid 70 DDCT
69 hp · 0-100 14.4 s
Spring Electric 65
65 hp · 0-100 13.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Hyundai i10 III range
Generation III launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the III
Compare
Popular duels involving the i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS
Take the next step
Find a i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS or value yours
Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.
Frequently asked questions
Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Among the 4 city cars 2017–2021, the i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS ranks Combined consumption (5.4 L/100, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS), Tank range (741 km, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 MPi 67 PS), 0–100 km/h (14.8 s, behind the Hyundai i10 1.0 T-GDi 100 PS).
741 km on a full tank (5.4 L/100 on the combined cycle) — autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.