Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /family SUV
AQ6vsBScenicBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsQ6 · Scenic

Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

family SUV · 2026 vs 2024 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiBEV

Q6 Sportback e-tron

252 ch · 83 kWh · 2026

VS
RenaultBEVPlus rapide

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

218 ch · 87 kWh · 2024

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi Q6 Sportback e-tron

7h45charging included

2 stops · 60.80 €

Gap1 minin favour of Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
BRenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

7h44charging included

3 stops · 65.18 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureQ6 Sportback e-tronScenic E-Tech Electric 220Gap
Total time7h457h441 min · Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
Charging stops2 stops3 stops1 stop · Q6 Sportback e-tron
Cost of energy used60.80 €65.18 €4.38 € · Q6 Sportback e-tron

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiBEV
Q6 Sportback e-tron
100%
426 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +33 kWh · 19.92 €
Charge 2
28 min · +49 kWh · 29.44 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h45
2
Stops
7h45
Duration
60.80 €
Cost of energy used
RenaultBEVFastest
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
100%
419 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +35 kWh · 20.88 €
Charge 2
17 min · +35 kWh · 20.88 €
Charge 3
9 min · +19 kWh · 11.48 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h44
3
Stops
7h44
Duration
65.18 €
Cost of energy used

Very close result: less than one minute apart on this route. Both vehicles are evenly matched on the motorway over this distance.

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 3 stops totalling 43 min for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 versus 2 stops totalling 45 min for the Q6 Sportback e-tron.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (15,6 kWh/100km for Q6 Sportback e-tron and 16,6 kWh/100km for Scenic E-Tech Electric 220) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,5 kWh/100km (Q6 Sportback e-tron) and 20,8 kWh/100km (Scenic E-Tech Electric 220). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 9,9 km/min versus 9,4 km/min

During the 43 minutes of charging for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220, range recovers by 427 km. During the 45 cumulative minutes for the Q6 Sportback e-tron, range recovers by 422 km. Per minute: the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 recovers 1,1× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 1,8× the electric cost of the Q6 Sportback e-tron and 1,7× that of the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi Q6 Sportback e-tron

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh383 km75 kWh consumed0.039 €/km14.95 €
Limonest, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 117 kW · 0.60 €/kWh170 km33 kWh consumed0.117 €/km19.92 €
Valence, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 105 kW · 0.60 €/kWh222 km43 kWh consumed0.117 €/km25.93 €
Trip total60.80 €

Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh377 km78 kWh consumed0.042 €/km15.67 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 123 kW · 0.60 €/kWh168 km35 kWh consumed0.124 €/km20.88 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 123 kW · 0.60 €/kWh168 km35 kWh consumed0.124 €/km20.88 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 128 kW · 0.60 €/kWh62 km13 kWh consumed0.125 €/km7.75 €
Trip total65.18 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationAudi Q6 Sportback e-tronRenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
5 minutes--
10 minutes--
20 minutes--
Full session 10 → 80 %--

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
15.6 kWh/100 km · 16.6 kWh/100 km
Net battery
83 kWh · 87 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiBEV

Q6 Sportback e-tron

252 ch · 83 kWh · 2026

RenaultBEV

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

218 ch · 87 kWh · 2024

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSAudi

Model Y Long Range RWD vs Q6 Sportback e-tron

RenaultVSBYD

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Atto 3 Extended Range

BMWVSAudi

iX3 vs Q6 Sportback e-tron

RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 arrives in 7h44 with 3 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 60.80 € (Q6 Sportback e-tron) and 65.18 € (Scenic E-Tech Electric 220). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.