Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
ARS 5PHEVvsBP7BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsRS 5 · P7

Audi RS 5 Sedan vs Xpeng P7

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2026 vs 2020 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
AudiPHEVPlus rapide

RS 5 Sedan

639 ch · 22 kWh · 2026

VS
XpengBEV

P7

263 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AAudi RS 5 Sedan

7h06charging included

1 stop · 184.37 €

Gap71 minin favour of RS 5 Sedan
BXpeng P7

8h17charging included

3 stops · 66.75 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureRS 5 SedanP7Gap
Total time7h068h1771 min · RS 5 Sedan
Charging stops1 stop3 stops2 stops · RS 5 Sedan
Cost of energy used184.37 €66.75 €117.62 € · P7

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

AudiPHEVFastest
RS 5 Sedan
100%
Battery
100%
Fuel tank
285 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +43 L · 93.74 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
184.37 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
P7
100%
372 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 2
24 min · +30 kWh · 18.00 €
Charge 3
29 min · +35 kWh · 20.87 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 8h17
3
Stops
8h17
Duration
66.75 €
Cost of energy used

The 71-minute lead of the RS 5 Sedan does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (1 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the RS 5 Sedan versus 3 stops totalling 76 min for the P7.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (18,4 kWh/100km for RS 5 Sedan and 16,8 kWh/100km for P7) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 12,0 L/100km (RS 5 Sedan) and 20,2 kWh/100km (P7). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,2 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~103 €. That is 0,6× the electric cost of the RS 5 Sedan and 1,5× that of the P7. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Audi RS 5 Sedan

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh78 km14 kWh consumed0.037 €/km2.87 €
Paris → Limonest, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L360 km43 L consumed0.260 €/km93.74 €
Limonest, A6 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L337 km40 L consumed0.260 €/km87.75 €
Trip total184.37 €

Xpeng P7

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh335 km68 kWh consumed0.040 €/km13.51 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh149 km30 kWh consumed0.121 €/km18.00 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh149 km30 kWh consumed0.121 €/km18.00 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 72 kW · 0.60 €/kWh143 km29 kWh consumed0.121 €/km17.24 €
Trip total66.75 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationAudi RS 5 SedanXpeng P7
5 minutes-~23 km
10 minutes-~46 km
20 minutes-~93 km
Full session 10 → 80 %-~260 km · 61 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
18.4 kWh/100 km · 16.8 kWh/100 km
Net battery
22 kWh · 75 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

AudiPHEV

RS 5 Sedan

639 ch · 22 kWh · 2026

XpengBEV

P7

263 ch · 75 kWh · 2020

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

RS 5 Sedan vs M340i xDrive

XpengVSTesla

P7 vs Model 3 Long Range RWD

AudiVSBMW

RS 5 Sedan vs M440i Gran Coupé

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 RWD vs P7

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the RS 5 Sedan arrives in 7h06 with 1 stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 184.37 € (RS 5 Sedan) and 66.75 € (P7). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.