Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /large SUV
AiXvsBScenicBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsiX · Scenic

BMW iX xDrive40 vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

large SUV · 2021 vs 2024 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWBEV

iX xDrive40

326 ch · 76.6 kWh · 2021

VS
RenaultBEVPlus rapide

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

218 ch · 87 kWh · 2024

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW iX xDrive40

8h21charging included

5 stops · 96.24 €

Gap37 minin favour of Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
BRenault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

7h44charging included

3 stops · 65.18 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureiX xDrive40Scenic E-Tech Electric 220Gap
Total time8h217h4437 min · Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
Charging stops5 stops3 stops2 stops · Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
Cost of energy used96.24 €65.18 €31.06 € · Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWBEV
iX xDrive40
100%
288 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +31 kWh · 18.38 €
Charge 2
17 min · +31 kWh · 18.38 €
Charge 3
17 min · +31 kWh · 18.38 €
Charge 4
17 min · +31 kWh · 18.38 €
Charge 5
13 min · +23 kWh · 13.70 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 8h21
5
Stops
8h21
Duration
96.24 €
Cost of energy used
RenaultBEVFastest
Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
100%
419 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +35 kWh · 20.88 €
Charge 2
17 min · +35 kWh · 20.88 €
Charge 3
9 min · +19 kWh · 11.48 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h44
3
Stops
7h44
Duration
65.18 €
Cost of energy used

The 37-minute lead of the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (3 vs 5).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 3 stops totalling 43 min for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 versus 5 stops totalling 80 min for the iX xDrive40.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (21,3 kWh/100km for iX xDrive40 and 16,6 kWh/100km for Scenic E-Tech Electric 220) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 26,6 kWh/100km (iX xDrive40) and 20,8 kWh/100km (Scenic E-Tech Electric 220). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 9,9 km/min versus 6,8 km/min

During the 43 minutes of charging for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220, range recovers by 427 km. During the 80 cumulative minutes for the iX xDrive40, range recovers by 547 km. Per minute: the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 recovers 1,5× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 1,2× the electric cost of the iX xDrive40 and 1,7× that of the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW iX xDrive40

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Beaune, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh259 km69 kWh consumed0.053 €/km13.79 €
Beaune, A6 → Tournus, A6energy charged at Ionity 108 kW · 0.60 €/kWh115 km31 kWh consumed0.160 €/km18.38 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 108 kW · 0.60 €/kWh115 km31 kWh consumed0.160 €/km18.38 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 108 kW · 0.60 €/kWh115 km31 kWh consumed0.160 €/km18.38 €
Montélimar, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 108 kW · 0.60 €/kWh115 km31 kWh consumed0.160 €/km18.38 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 105 kW · 0.60 €/kWh56 km15 kWh consumed0.159 €/km8.91 €
Trip total96.24 €

Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh377 km78 kWh consumed0.042 €/km15.67 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 123 kW · 0.60 €/kWh168 km35 kWh consumed0.124 €/km20.88 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 123 kW · 0.60 €/kWh168 km35 kWh consumed0.124 €/km20.88 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 128 kW · 0.60 €/kWh62 km13 kWh consumed0.125 €/km7.75 €
Trip total65.18 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationBMW iX xDrive40Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
5 minutes--
10 minutes--
20 minutes--
Full session 10 → 80 %--

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
21.3 kWh/100 km · 16.6 kWh/100 km
Net battery
76.6 kWh · 87 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWBEV

iX xDrive40

326 ch · 76.6 kWh · 2021

RenaultBEV

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220

218 ch · 87 kWh · 2024

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSBMW

Model X 100D vs iX xDrive40

RenaultVSBYD

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Atto 3 Extended Range

TeslaVSBMW

Model X 90D vs iX xDrive40

RenaultVSAudi

Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 vs Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 arrives in 7h44 with 3 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 96.24 € (iX xDrive40) and 65.18 € (Scenic E-Tech Electric 220). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.