Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
AM3vsBSQ5Petrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsM3 · SQ5

BMW M3 Competition F80 vs Audi SQ5 SUV

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2020 vs 2026 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
BMWPetrolPlus rapide

M3 Competition F80

510 ch · 2020

VS
AudiPetrol

SQ5 SUV

367 ch · 2026

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start réservoir plein · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ABMW M3 Competition F80

7h06charging included

1 stop · 127.81 €

Gap10 minin favour of M3 Competition
BAudi SQ5 SUV

7h16charging included

3 stops · 487.71 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureM3 Competition F80SQ5 SUVGap
Total time7h067h1610 min · M3 Competition F80
Charging stops1 stop3 stops2 stops · M3 Competition F80
Cost of energy used127.81 €487.71 €359.90 € · M3 Competition F80

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

BMWPetrolFastest
M3 Competition F80
100%
699 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +53 L · 115.23 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h06
1
Stops
7h06
Duration
127.81 €
Cost of energy used
AudiPetrol
SQ5 SUV
100%
202 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Refuel 1
5 min · +59 L · 126.94 €
Refuel 2
5 min · +59 L · 126.94 €
Refuel 3
5 min · +59 L · 126.94 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h16
3
Stops
7h16
Duration
487.71 €
Cost of energy used

The 10-minute lead of the M3 Competition F80 does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (1 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 5 min for the M3 Competition F80 versus 3 stops totalling 15 min for the SQ5 SUV.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (10,2 L/100km for M3 Competition F80 and 8,8 L/100km for SQ5 SUV) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 7,6 L/100km (M3 Competition F80) and 29,0 L/100km (SQ5 SUV). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

BMW M3 Competition F80

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Manosque, A51fuel · 2.17 €/L699 km53 L consumed0.165 €/km115.23 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L76 km6 L consumed0.166 €/km12.59 €
Trip total127.81 €

Audi SQ5 SUV

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Beaune, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L202 km58 L consumed0.628 €/km126.94 €
Beaune, A6 → Limonest, A6fuel · 2.17 €/L202 km58 L consumed0.628 €/km126.94 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7fuel · 2.17 €/L202 km58 L consumed0.628 €/km126.94 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseillefuel · 2.17 €/L170 km49 L consumed0.629 €/km106.87 €
Trip total487.71 €

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
10.2 L/100 km · 8.8 L/100 km
Fuel tank
59 L · 65 L

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

BMWPetrol

M3 Competition F80

510 ch · 2020

AudiPetrol

SQ5 SUV

367 ch · 2026

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSAudi

M3 Competition vs S5 Avant

AudiVSBMW

SQ5 SUV vs X3 M40i

BMWVSAudi

M3 Competition vs S5 Sedan

AudiVSBMW

SQ5 SUV vs X3 M40i

Frequently asked questions

On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the M3 Competition F80 arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 127.81 € (M3 Competition F80) and 487.71 € (SQ5 SUV). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.