CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie
354 ch · 85 kWh · 2025
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
| Measure | CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie | E-PACE P200 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total time | 7h09 | 7h06 | 3 min · E-PACE P200 |
| Charging stops | 1 stop | 1 stop | Same |
| Cost of energy used | 37.48 € | 161.87 € | 124.39 € · CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie |
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The E-PACE P200 (combustion) makes 1 stop of 5 min, the CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie (electric) 1 stop of 9 min. Road safety reminder: on a trip of this duration, it is recommended to stop for at least 51 min total (17 min every 2h). The energy cost is 37,48 € for CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie versus 161,87 € for E-PACE P200.
The official WLTP figures (12,2 kWh/100km for CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie and 7,7 L/100km for E-PACE P200) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 14,6 kWh/100km (CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie) and 9,6 L/100km (E-PACE P200). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.
On a 200 km round trip (e.g. a weekend getaway), the electric or plug-in hybrid vehicle completes the entire journey on home energy at 0.20 €/kWh - with no charging stop. The time advantage of the combustion car on long-distance motorways disappears entirely, and the economic advantage of electric strengthens considerably.
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Valence, A7 | initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh | 523 km | 77 kWh consumed | 0.029 €/km | 15.31 € |
| Valence, A7 → Marseille | energy charged at Ionity 276 kW · 0.60 €/kWh | 252 km | 37 kWh consumed | 0.088 €/km | 22.18 € |
| Trip total | 37.48 € |
| Segment | Energy used | Distance | Consumption | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Montélimar, A7 | fuel · 2.17 €/L | 636 km | 61 L consumed | 0.209 €/km | 132.80 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseille | fuel · 2.17 €/L | 139 km | 13 L consumed | 0.209 €/km | 29.06 € |
| Trip total | 161.87 € |
| Charging stop duration | Mercedes CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie | Jaguar E-PACE P200 |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | ~128 km | - |
| 10 minutes | ~255 km | - |
| 20 minutes | ~510 km | - |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | ~406 km · 17 min | - |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
354 ch · 85 kWh · 2025
200 ch · 2018
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the E-PACE P200 arrives in 7h06 with 1 fuel stop.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
On this trip, the energy used costs 37.48 € (CLA 350 4MATIC mit EQ Technologie) and 161.87 € (E-PACE P200). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.