Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /family SUV
AGLCvsBG9BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsGLC · G9

Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC X254 vs Xpeng G9

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

family SUV · 2025 vs 2022 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
MercedesBEVPlus rapide

GLC 400 4MATIC X254

489 ch · 94 kWh · 2025

VS
XpengBEV

G9

308 ch · 91 kWh · 2022

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AMercedes GLC 400 4MATIC X254

7h11charging included

1 stop · 42.89 €

Gap13 minin favour of GLC 400 4MATIC
BXpeng G9

7h24charging included

3 stops · 77.69 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureGLC 400 4MATIC X254G9Gap
Total time7h117h2413 min · GLC 400 4MATIC X254
Charging stops1 stop3 stops2 stops · GLC 400 4MATIC X254
Cost of energy used42.89 €77.69 €34.80 € · GLC 400 4MATIC X254

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

MercedesBEVFastest
GLC 400 4MATIC X254
100%
570 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
10 min · +48 kWh · 28.93 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h11
1
Stops
7h11
Duration
42.89 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
G9
100%
383 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
8 min · +36 kWh · 21.84 €
Charge 2
8 min · +36 kWh · 21.84 €
Charge 3
8 min · +36 kWh · 21.89 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h24
3
Stops
7h24
Duration
77.69 €
Cost of energy used

The 13-minute lead of the GLC 400 4MATIC X254 does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (1 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 10 min for the GLC 400 4MATIC X254 versus 3 stops totalling 23 min for the G9.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (13,2 kWh/100km for GLC 400 4MATIC X254 and 19,0 kWh/100km for G9) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 16,5 kWh/100km (GLC 400 4MATIC X254) and 23,8 kWh/100km (G9). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 29,2 km/min versus 20,0 km/min

During the 10 minutes of charging for the GLC 400 4MATIC X254, range recovers by 292 km. During the 23 cumulative minutes for the G9, range recovers by 459 km. Per minute: the GLC 400 4MATIC X254 recovers 1,5× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 2,6× the electric cost of the GLC 400 4MATIC X254 and 1,4× that of the G9. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC X254

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh513 km85 kWh consumed0.033 €/km16.93 €
Valence, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 289 kW · 0.60 €/kWh262 km43 kWh consumed0.099 €/km25.96 €
Trip total42.89 €

Xpeng G9

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh345 km82 kWh consumed0.048 €/km16.39 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 273 kW · 0.60 €/kWh153 km36 kWh consumed0.143 €/km21.84 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 273 kW · 0.60 €/kWh153 km36 kWh consumed0.143 €/km21.84 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 274 kW · 0.60 €/kWh124 km29 kWh consumed0.142 €/km17.62 €
Trip total77.69 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationMercedes GLC 400 4MATIC X254Xpeng G9
5 minutes~117 km~74 km
10 minutes~233 km~147 km
20 minutes~467 km~295 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~399 km · 18 min~268 km · 20 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
13.2 kWh/100 km · 19.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
94 kWh · 91 kWh
Max DC charging
330 kW · 300 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

MercedesBEV

GLC 400 4MATIC X254

489 ch · 94 kWh · 2025

XpengBEV

G9

308 ch · 91 kWh · 2022

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSFord

GLC 400 4MATIC vs Mustang Mach-E GT

BMWVSXpeng

iX xDrive40 vs G9

MercedesVSXpeng

GLC 400 4MATIC vs G6

BMWVSXpeng

iX xDrive50 vs G9

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the GLC 400 4MATIC X254 arrives in 7h11 with 1 charging stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 42.89 € (GLC 400 4MATIC X254) and 77.69 € (G9). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.