Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /family SUV
AGLCvsBP7iBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsGLC · P7i

Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 vs Xpeng P7i

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

family SUV · 2025 vs 2023 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
MercedesBEVPlus rapide

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

489 ch · 94 kWh · 2025

VS
XpengBEV

P7i

282 ch · 80 kWh · 2023

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

AMercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

7h11charging included

1 stop · 42.89 €

Gap17 minin favour of GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology
BXpeng P7i

7h28charging included

3 stops · 65.51 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureGLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254P7iGap
Total time7h117h2817 min · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
Charging stops1 stop3 stops2 stops · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
Cost of energy used42.89 €65.51 €22.62 € · GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

MercedesBEVFastest
GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254
100%
570 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
10 min · +48 kWh · 28.93 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h11
1
Stops
7h11
Duration
42.89 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEV
P7i
100%
394 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
9 min · +32 kWh · 19.20 €
Charge 2
9 min · +32 kWh · 19.20 €
Charge 3
8 min · +27 kWh · 16.35 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h28
3
Stops
7h28
Duration
65.51 €
Cost of energy used

The 17-minute lead of the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (1 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 10 min for the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 versus 3 stops totalling 27 min for the P7i.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (13,2 kWh/100km for GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 and 16,9 kWh/100km for P7i) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 16,5 kWh/100km (GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254) and 20,3 kWh/100km (P7i). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 29,2 km/min versus 16,7 km/min

During the 10 minutes of charging for the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254, range recovers by 292 km. During the 27 cumulative minutes for the P7i, range recovers by 450 km. Per minute: the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 recovers 1,8× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 2,6× the electric cost of the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 and 1,7× that of the P7i. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Mercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh513 km85 kWh consumed0.033 €/km16.93 €
Valence, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 289 kW · 0.60 €/kWh262 km43 kWh consumed0.099 €/km25.96 €
Trip total42.89 €

Xpeng P7i

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh355 km72 kWh consumed0.041 €/km14.41 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 213 kW · 0.60 €/kWh158 km32 kWh consumed0.122 €/km19.20 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 213 kW · 0.60 €/kWh158 km32 kWh consumed0.122 €/km19.20 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 204 kW · 0.60 €/kWh104 km21 kWh consumed0.122 €/km12.70 €
Trip total65.51 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationMercedes GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254Xpeng P7i
5 minutes~117 km~62 km
10 minutes~233 km~124 km
20 minutes~467 km~247 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~399 km · 18 min~276 km · 24 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
13.2 kWh/100 km · 16.9 kWh/100 km
Net battery
94 kWh · 80 kWh
Max DC charging
330 kW · 215 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

MercedesBEV

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254

489 ch · 94 kWh · 2025

XpengBEV

P7i

282 ch · 80 kWh · 2023

Other duels you might be interested in

MercedesVSFord

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology vs Mustang Mach-E GT

TeslaVSXpeng

Model 3 RWD vs P7i

MercedesVSXpeng

GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology vs G6

BMWVSXpeng

i4 eDrive35 vs P7i

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254 arrives in 7h11 with 1 charging stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 42.89 € (GLC 400 4MATIC with EQ Technology X254) and 65.51 € (P7i). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (~7.8 L/100 km) would cost about 112 € in fuel.