Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /compact
AMeganevsBMONABEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsMegane · MONA

Renault Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs Xpeng MONA M03

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

compact · 2022 vs 2024 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
RenaultBEV

Megane E-Tech Electric 217

218 ch · 55 kWh · 2022

VS
XpengBEVPlus rapide

MONA M03

208 ch · 58 kWh · 2024

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ARenault Megane E-Tech Electric 217

7h50charging included

4 stops · 65.02 €

Gap14 minin favour of MONA M03
BXpeng MONA M03

7h36charging included

2 stops · 34.93 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureMegane E-Tech Electric 217MONA M03Gap
Total time7h507h3614 min · MONA M03
Charging stops4 stops2 stops2 stops · MONA M03
Cost of energy used65.02 €34.93 €30.09 € · MONA M03

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

RenaultBEV
Megane E-Tech Electric 217
100%
302 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
11 min · +22 kWh · 13.20 €
Charge 2
11 min · +22 kWh · 13.20 €
Charge 3
11 min · +22 kWh · 13.20 €
Charge 4
17 min · +31 kWh · 18.80 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h50
4
Stops
7h50
Duration
65.02 €
Cost of energy used
XpengBEVFastest
MONA M03
100%
483 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
18 min · +23 kWh · 13.92 €
Charge 2
17 min · +21 kWh · 12.72 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h36
2
Stops
7h36
Duration
34.93 €
Cost of energy used

The 14-minute lead of the MONA M03 does not come from driving speed, but from 2 fewer charging stops on this route (2 vs 4).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 35 min for the MONA M03 versus 4 stops totalling 49 min for the Megane E-Tech Electric 217.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (15,2 kWh/100km for Megane E-Tech Electric 217 and 10,0 kWh/100km for MONA M03) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 18,2 kWh/100km (Megane E-Tech Electric 217) and 12,0 kWh/100km (MONA M03). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 10,6 km/min versus 10,9 km/min

During the 35 minutes of charging for the MONA M03, range recovers by 370 km. During the 49 cumulative minutes for the Megane E-Tech Electric 217, range recovers by 535 km. Per minute, both recover at the same rate. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 6,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~97 €. That is 1,5× the electric cost of the Megane E-Tech Electric 217 and 2,8× that of the MONA M03. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Renault Megane E-Tech Electric 217

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Beaune, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh271 km50 kWh consumed0.037 €/km9.90 €
Beaune, A6 → Limonest, A6energy charged at Ionity 120 kW · 0.60 €/kWh121 km22 kWh consumed0.109 €/km13.20 €
Limonest, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 120 kW · 0.60 €/kWh121 km22 kWh consumed0.109 €/km13.20 €
Valence, A7 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 120 kW · 0.60 €/kWh121 km22 kWh consumed0.109 €/km13.20 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 111 kW · 0.60 €/kWh142 km26 kWh consumed0.109 €/km15.52 €
Trip total65.02 €

Xpeng MONA M03

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh435 km52 kWh consumed0.024 €/km10.45 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 77 kW · 0.60 €/kWh193 km23 kWh consumed0.072 €/km13.92 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 75 kW · 0.60 €/kWh147 km18 kWh consumed0.072 €/km10.56 €
Trip total34.93 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationRenault Megane E-Tech Electric 217Xpeng MONA M03
5 minutes~42 km~39 km
10 minutes~83 km~78 km
20 minutes~166 km~156 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~211 km · 27 min~338 km · 47 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
15.2 kWh/100 km · 10.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
55 kWh · 58 kWh
Max DC charging
130 kW · 80 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

RenaultBEV

Megane E-Tech Electric 217

218 ch · 55 kWh · 2022

XpengBEV

MONA M03

208 ch · 58 kWh · 2024

Other duels you might be interested in

RenaultVSVolkswagen

Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs ID.3 Pro

XpengVSVolkswagen

MONA M03 vs ID.3 Pro

RenaultVSVolkswagen

Megane E-Tech Electric 217 vs ID.3 Pro S

XpengVSVolkswagen

MONA M03 vs ID.3 Pro S

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the MONA M03 arrives in 7h36 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 65.02 € (Megane E-Tech Electric 217) and 34.93 € (MONA M03). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 308 1.2 PureTech 130 (~6.8 L/100 km) would cost about 97 € in fuel.