Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /saloon
AModel 3vsBModel 3BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel 3 · Model 3

Tesla Model 3 Performance vs Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

saloon · 2024 vs 2021 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

510 ch · 78 kWh · 2024

VS
TeslaBEVPlus rapide

Model 3 Long Range AWD

360 ch · 78 kWh · 2021

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ATesla Model 3 Performance

7h23charging included

3 stops · 62.09 €

Gap7 minin favour of Model 3 Long Range AWD
BTesla Model 3 Long Range AWD

7h16charging included

2 stops · 46.84 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel 3 PerformanceModel 3 Long Range AWDGap
Total time7h237h167 min · Model 3 Long Range AWD
Charging stops3 stops2 stops1 stop · Model 3 Long Range AWD
Cost of energy used62.09 €46.84 €15.25 € · Model 3 Long Range AWD

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEV
Model 3 Performance
100%
402 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
8 min · +31 kWh · 18.72 €
Charge 2
8 min · +31 kWh · 18.72 €
Charge 3
6 min · +23 kWh · 14.09 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h23
3
Stops
7h23
Duration
62.09 €
Cost of energy used
TeslaBEVFastest
Model 3 Long Range AWD
100%
484 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
8 min · +31 kWh · 18.72 €
Charge 2
7 min · +28 kWh · 16.97 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h16
2
Stops
7h16
Duration
46.84 €
Cost of energy used

The 7-minute lead of the Model 3 Long Range AWD does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (2 vs 3).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 15 min for the Model 3 Long Range AWD versus 3 stops totalling 22 min for the Model 3 Performance.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (16,7 kWh/100km for Model 3 Performance and 14,7 kWh/100km for Model 3 Long Range AWD) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 19,4 kWh/100km (Model 3 Performance) and 16,1 kWh/100km (Model 3 Long Range AWD). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 24,6 km/min versus 20,1 km/min

During the 15 minutes of charging for the Model 3 Long Range AWD, range recovers by 369 km. During the 22 cumulative minutes for the Model 3 Performance, range recovers by 443 km. Per minute: the Model 3 Long Range AWD recovers 1,2× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,2 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~103 €. That is 1,7× the electric cost of the Model 3 Performance and 2,2× that of the Model 3 Long Range AWD. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla Model 3 Performance

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh362 km70 kWh consumed0.039 €/km14.05 €
Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Supercharger 234 kW · 0.60 €/kWh161 km31 kWh consumed0.116 €/km18.72 €
Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Supercharger 234 kW · 0.60 €/kWh161 km31 kWh consumed0.116 €/km18.72 €
Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 235 kW · 0.60 €/kWh91 km18 kWh consumed0.117 €/km10.60 €
Trip total62.09 €

Tesla Model 3 Long Range AWD

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh436 km70 kWh consumed0.032 €/km14.05 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Supercharger 234 kW · 0.60 €/kWh194 km31 kWh consumed0.096 €/km18.72 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 242 kW · 0.60 €/kWh146 km23 kWh consumed0.096 €/km14.07 €
Trip total46.84 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationTesla Model 3 PerformanceTesla Model 3 Long Range AWD
5 minutes~75 km~91 km
10 minutes~150 km~181 km
20 minutes~301 km~362 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~282 km · 20 min~339 km · 20 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
16.7 kWh/100 km · 14.7 kWh/100 km
Net battery
78 kWh · 78 kWh
Max DC charging
250 kW · 250 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model 3 Performance

510 ch · 78 kWh · 2024

TeslaBEV

Model 3 Long Range AWD

360 ch · 78 kWh · 2021

Other duels you might be interested in

BMWVSTesla

i4 M50 xDrive vs Model 3 Performance

VolvoVSTesla

V60 T8 AWD Recharge vs Model 3 Long Range AWD

TeslaVSVolvo

Model 3 Performance vs V60 T8 AWD Recharge

TeslaVSBMW

Model 3 Long Range AWD vs i4 eDrive35

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Model 3 Long Range AWD arrives in 7h16 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 62.09 € (Model 3 Performance) and 46.84 € (Model 3 Long Range AWD). For reference, an equivalent Peugeot 508 1.6 PureTech 180 (~7.2 L/100 km) would cost about 103 € in fuel.