Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
AModelvsBSBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · S

Tesla Model S Performance vs Audi S e-tron GT

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2019 vs 2025 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
TeslaBEV

Model S Performance

778 ch · 100 kWh · 2019

VS
AudiBEVPlus rapide

S e-tron GT

670 ch · 105 kWh · 2025

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ATesla Model S Performance

7h20charging included

2 stops · 59.47 €

Gap7 minin favour of S e-tron GT
BAudi S e-tron GT

7h13charging included

1 stop · 49.45 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel S PerformanceS e-tron GTGap
Total time7h207h137 min · S e-tron GT
Charging stops2 stops1 stop1 stop · S e-tron GT
Cost of energy used59.47 €49.45 €10.02 € · S e-tron GT

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEV
Model S Performance
100%
487 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
10 min · +40 kWh · 24.00 €
Charge 2
9 min · +35 kWh · 21.16 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h20
2
Stops
7h20
Duration
59.47 €
Cost of energy used
AudiBEVFastest
S e-tron GT
100%
560 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
12 min · +57 kWh · 33.92 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h13
1
Stops
7h13
Duration
49.45 €
Cost of energy used

The 7-minute lead of the S e-tron GT does not come from driving speed, but from one fewer charging stop on this route (1 vs 2).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 1 stop of 12 min for the S e-tron GT versus 2 stops totalling 19 min for the Model S Performance.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (19,3 kWh/100km for Model S Performance and 15,9 kWh/100km for S e-tron GT) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 20,5 kWh/100km (Model S Performance) and 18,8 kWh/100km (S e-tron GT). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 25,1 km/min versus 19,3 km/min

During the 12 minutes of charging for the S e-tron GT, range recovers by 301 km. During the 19 cumulative minutes for the Model S Performance, range recovers by 367 km. Per minute: the S e-tron GT recovers 1,3× faster. The gap is less pronounced but accumulates over long distances.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 1,9× the electric cost of the Model S Performance and 2,3× that of the S e-tron GT. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla Model S Performance

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh438 km90 kWh consumed0.041 €/km18.01 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Supercharger 240 kW · 0.60 €/kWh195 km40 kWh consumed0.123 €/km24.00 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 235 kW · 0.60 €/kWh142 km29 kWh consumed0.123 €/km17.46 €
Trip total59.47 €

Audi S e-tron GT

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Valence, A7initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh504 km95 kWh consumed0.038 €/km18.91 €
Valence, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 283 kW · 0.60 €/kWh271 km51 kWh consumed0.113 €/km30.54 €
Trip total49.45 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationTesla Model S PerformanceAudi S e-tron GT
5 minutes~71 km~99 km
10 minutes~142 km~199 km
20 minutes~284 km~398 km
Full session 10 → 80 %~341 km · 26 min~392 km · 21 min

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
19.3 kWh/100 km · 15.9 kWh/100 km
Net battery
100 kWh · 105 kWh
Max DC charging
250 kW · 320 kW

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model S Performance

778 ch · 100 kWh · 2019

AudiBEV

S e-tron GT

670 ch · 105 kWh · 2025

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSPorsche

Model S Performance vs Taycan Turbo S

AudiVSPorsche

S e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo

TeslaVSPorsche

Model S Performance vs Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo

AudiVSPorsche

S e-tron GT vs Taycan Turbo Cross Turismo

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the S e-tron GT arrives in 7h13 with 1 charging stop.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 59.47 € (Model S Performance) and 49.45 € (S e-tron GT). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.