Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Motorway
  3. /grand tourer
AModelvsBSealBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · Seal

Tesla Model S Performance vs BYD Seal U 160kW 2WD

Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.

grand tourer · 2019 vs 2023 · Paris → Marseille · 775 km · 130 km/h
TeslaBEVPlus rapide

Model S Performance

778 ch · 100 kWh · 2019

VS
BYDBEV

Seal U 160kW 2WD

218 ch · 80 kWh · 2023

Simulation trip
Assumptions: 130 km/h · start 100 % · mild weather

Result · total trip time

ATesla Model S Performance

7h20charging included

2 stops · 59.47 €

Gap23 minin favour of Model S Performance
BBYD Seal U 160kW 2WD

7h43charging included

2 stops · 56.77 €

Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel S PerformanceSeal U 160kW 2WDGap
Total time7h207h4323 min · Model S Performance
Charging stops2 stops2 stopsSame
Cost of energy used59.47 €56.77 €2.70 € · Seal U 160kW 2WD

Visualise the trip

Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.

TeslaBEVFastest
Model S Performance
100%
487 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
10 min · +40 kWh · 24.00 €
Charge 2
9 min · +35 kWh · 21.16 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h20
2
Stops
7h20
Duration
59.47 €
Cost of energy used
BYDBEV
Seal U 160kW 2WD
100%
435 km
Range
Paris
0 km · departure
Charge 1
17 min · +32 kWh · 19.20 €
Charge 2
25 min · +44 kWh · 26.47 €
Marseille
775 km · Arrival 7h43
2
Stops
7h43
Duration
56.77 €
Cost of energy used

The 23-minute lead of the Model S Performance does not come from driving speed, but from shorter stops on this route (19 min vs 42 min).

Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 2 stops totalling 19 min for the Model S Performance versus 2 stops totalling 42 min for the Seal U 160kW 2WD.

Motorway consumption: the Caralogy methodology

The official WLTP figures (19,3 kWh/100km for Model S Performance and 17,0 kWh/100km for Seal U 160kW 2WD) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 20,5 kWh/100km (Model S Performance) and 18,4 kWh/100km (Seal U 160kW 2WD). Full methodology: see the assumptions below the controls.

Recovery speed: 19,3 km/min versus 9,9 km/min

During the 19 minutes of charging for the Model S Performance, range recovers by 367 km. During the 42 cumulative minutes for the Seal U 160kW 2WD, range recovers by 414 km. Per minute: the Model S Performance recovers 1,9× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.

For reference: how much would an equivalent petrol car cost?

A BMW 530i (equivalent segment) consumes about 8,0 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~115 €. That is 1,9× the electric cost of the Model S Performance and 2,0× that of the Seal U 160kW 2WD. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.

Energy cost breakdown for your trip Paris → Marseille

The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.

Tesla Model S Performance

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh438 km90 kWh consumed0.041 €/km18.01 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Supercharger 240 kW · 0.60 €/kWh195 km40 kWh consumed0.123 €/km24.00 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Supercharger 235 kW · 0.60 €/kWh142 km29 kWh consumed0.123 €/km17.46 €
Trip total59.47 €

BYD Seal U 160kW 2WD

SegmentEnergy usedDistanceConsumption€/kmCost (€)
Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0.20 €/kWh391 km72 kWh consumed0.037 €/km14.41 €
Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 113 kW · 0.60 €/kWh174 km32 kWh consumed0.110 €/km19.20 €
Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 106 kW · 0.60 €/kWh210 km39 kWh consumed0.110 €/km23.16 €
Trip total56.77 €

Range recovered by stop duration

How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
Charging stop durationTesla Model S PerformanceBYD Seal U 160kW 2WD
5 minutes~71 km-
10 minutes~142 km-
20 minutes~284 km-
Full session 10 → 80 %~341 km · 26 min-

What produces these figures

WLTP combined consumption
19.3 kWh/100 km · 17.0 kWh/100 km
Net battery
100 kWh · 80 kWh

Compare with another vehicle

Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment

TeslaBEV

Model S Performance

778 ch · 100 kWh · 2019

BYDBEV

Seal U 160kW 2WD

218 ch · 80 kWh · 2023

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSPorsche

Model S Performance vs Taycan Turbo S

TeslaVSBYD

Model 3 Standard Range Plus vs Seal U 160kW 2WD

TeslaVSPorsche

Model S Performance vs Taycan Turbo S Cross Turismo

TeslaVSBYD

Model 3 Long Range RWD vs Seal U 160kW 2WD

Frequently asked questions

The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the Model S Performance arrives in 7h20 with 2 charging stops.

WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.

Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.

No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.

On this trip, the energy used costs 59.47 € (Model S Performance) and 56.77 € (Seal U 160kW 2WD). For reference, an equivalent BMW 530i (~8.0 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in fuel.