XpengBEV
G9
308 ch · 91 kWh · 2022
Trip mapped at a glance. Charging stops visible, total duration predictable. Caralogy simulation at 130 km/h.
Paris → Marseille · 130 km/h · Caralogy simulation
| G9 | Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW | |
|---|---|---|
| Total time | 7h24−13 min | 7h37 |
| Charging stops | 3 stops | 2 stops−1 stop |
| Cost of energy used | 77.69 € | 54.24 €−23.45 € |
Both vehicles drive at 130 km/h. The difference comes from charging stops.
Analysis
Both vehicles drove at 130 km/h for the entire trip. The gap is built at the stops: 3 stops totalling 23 min for the G9 versus 2 stops totalling 36 min for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW.
The official WLTP figures (19,0 kWh/100km for G9 and 14,1 kWh/100km for Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW) are measured on a mixed cycle averaging ~46 km/h. At a steady 130 km/h, aerodynamic drag weighs much more heavily - it grows with the square of speed. Caralogy calculates a motorway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve - not a uniform correction factor. For this trip, the simulation yields 23,8 kWh/100km (G9) and 17,6 kWh/100km (Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW). Full methodology: see the dedicated button above the summary.
During the 23 minutes of charging for the G9, range recovers by 459 km. During the 36 cumulative minutes for the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW, range recovers by 412 km. Per minute: the G9 recovers 1,8× faster. At this rate, the charging stop blends into the trip rhythm - just enough time for a coffee. At a lower rate, it dictates the pace.
A Peugeot 3008 1.2 PureTech 130 (equivalent segment) consumes about 7,8 L/100km on the motorway at 130 km/h. At 1,9 €/L, this Paris → Marseille trip would cost ~112 €. That is 1,4× the electric cost of the G9 and 2,1× that of the Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW. The gap narrows in winter but never reverses.
The cost per kilometre depends on the electricity rate applied to each segment - based on the energy source used at that point of the trip.
| Segment | Distance | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Tournus, A6initial energy charged at home · 0,20 €/kWh | 345 km82 kWh consumed | 0,048 €/km | 16,39 € |
| Tournus, A6 → Valence, A7energy charged at Ionity 273 kW · 0,60 €/kWh | 153 km36 kWh consumed | 0,143 €/km | 21,84 € |
| Valence, A7 → Manosque, A51energy charged at Ionity 273 kW · 0,60 €/kWh | 153 km36 kWh consumed | 0,143 €/km | 21,84 € |
| Manosque, A51 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 274 kW · 0,60 €/kWh | 124 km29 kWh consumed | 0,142 €/km | 17,62 € |
| Trip total | 77,69 € | ||
| Segment | Distance | €/km | Cost (€) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paris → Limonest, A6initial energy charged at home · 0,20 €/kWh | 393 km69 kWh consumed | 0,035 €/km | 13,87 € |
| Limonest, A6 → Montélimar, A7energy charged at Ionity 132 kW · 0,60 €/kWh | 175 km31 kWh consumed | 0,106 €/km | 18,48 € |
| Montélimar, A7 → Marseilleenergy charged at Ionity 119 kW · 0,60 €/kWh | 207 km36 kWh consumed | 0,106 €/km | 21,90 € |
| Trip total | 54,24 € | ||
How many kilometres do you recover depending on the time spent at the charger? Comparison at nominal peak power.
| Charging stop duration | Xpeng G9 | Audi Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW |
|---|---|---|
| 5 minutes | ~74 km | ~45 km |
| 10 minutes | ~147 km | ~89 km |
| 20 minutes | ~295 km | ~179 km |
| Full session 10 → 80 % | ~268 km20 min | ~306 km37 min |
Replace one of the two with an alternative from the same segment
308 ch · 91 kWh · 2022
286 ch · 77 kWh · 2023
The advantage comes from the combo real range + charging speed. On Paris → Marseille (775 km at 130 km/h), the G9 arrives in 7h24 with 3 charging stops.
WLTP consumption does not reflect motorway reality. Aerodynamic drag grows with the square of speed, so real consumption is 15 to 25 % higher than WLTP combined. Caralogy calculates a highway consumption specific to each vehicle based on its aerodynamic profile (SCx), weight and power curve.
Total time = driving time + charging time. Driving time is calculated at an average speed of 130 km/h on the motorway (adjustable). Charging time is calculated based on the real power curve of each vehicle, respecting the optimal 10 → 80 % range and the maximum power accepted by the chargers on the route.
No. The displayed cost covers only the energy consumed during the trip: kWh × energy rate, with a mix of home charging and DC fast chargers. Battery wear is a long-term ownership cost, not a trip cost.
Electric: 77,69 € (G9) and 54,24 € (Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW). An equivalent petrol SUV (~8 L/100 km) would cost about 115 € in motorway fuel. Electric costs less in energy but adds charging stops.