Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1: 0-100 and simulated times

Caralogy physics simulation - lap times, acceleration curve, segment positioning.

compact2018standing start · flat road · summer tyres in good conditionLast simulation : 04/18/2026Methodology

Result

8,1 s
0–100 km/h
manufacturer: 7,9s
400 m standing start
16,0 s
at 140 km/h
Top speed
144 km/h
electronically limited

Full-throttle acceleration curve

Speed reached as a function of time from a standing start, flat road, summer tyres in good condition.
501001505s10s15s20s25s00s100 km/h · 8,1s
0 → 50 km/h · 3,2 s
launch phase
50 → 100 km/h · 4,9 s
peak torque

Accelerations · standing start

0 → 30 km/h
1,9 s
0 → 40 km/h
2,5 s
0 → 50 km/h
3,2 s
0 → 60 km/h
3,9 s
0 → 70 km/h
4,7 s
0 → 80 km/h
5,7 s
0 → 90 km/h
6,8 s
0 → 100 km/h
8,1 s
0 → 110 km/h
9,5 s
0 → 120 km/h
11,3 s
0 → 130 km/h
13,4 s
0 → 140 km/h
16,0 s

Distances · top speed

400 m (1/4 mile)
16,0 s
Trap speed 400 m
140 km/h
1,000 m
31,1 s
Top speed reached
144 km/h

Detailed performance measurements

All measurements produced by the Caralogy simulation engine for this vehicle.

Power
150 ch · 110 kW
Torque
320 Nm
Kerb weight
1 579 kg
Weight / Power
10,5 kg/ch

How Caralogy calculates these lap times

All values are produced by the Caralogy physics simulation engine from mass, SCx, power curve, max wheel torque, transmission ratio and traction. They may differ from published measurements as lap times vary by test protocol, specimen and conditions. Our goal is to provide comparable lap times across vehicles.

Rear-wheel drive: weight transfer aids rear grip, but high torque can cause wheelspin.

Analysis

Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1 performance analysis

+0,2 s vs the manufacturer figure

The Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1 reaches 100 km/h in 8,1 s in our simulation, i.e. +0,2 s against the 7,9 s quoted by the manufacturer. Performance times vary with many factors: test conditions (temperature, road surface, wind, tyres), the specific car tested (press vehicles are often in optimal trim), the measurement protocol of each tester, and the driver. That is why Autocar, Car and Driver or MotorTrend can quote different times for the same model. Caralogy does not try to reproduce those conditions — they are not reproducible at scale — but to provide times that are comparable between vehicles, computed under identical simulation conditions.

Rear-wheel drive — rear grip off the line

With rear-wheel drive, weight transfer at launch loads the rear wheels, which helps grip. But high torque can still cause wheelspin, especially on a wet surface.

0–200 km/h and high speeds

At high speed, aerodynamic drag grows with the square of velocity. CdA and peak power become the deciding factors.

Position within the {0} segment

0–100 km/h8,1 s
Slower · 13,1 sFaster · 4,1 s
Top speed144 km/h
Slower · 130 km/hFaster · 184 km/h

Where does the {0} stand against the other cars in its segment? Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1 sits among the cars of its segment. Times are compared under identical simulation conditions, so the ranking is fair.

Against its rivals: 0-100 km/h

Compare with a rival

Continue with the Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1

The same car, from other angles.

Frequently asked questions

What is the 0-100 km/h of the Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1?
The Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1 reaches 100 km/h in 8,1 s according to Caralogy simulation (manufacturer claims 7,9 s).
What is the top speed of the Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1?
The simulated top speed is 144 km/h.
How does Caralogy calculate these lap times?
Caralogy uses a physics simulation engine modelling mass, aerodynamic SCx, torque curve, transmission and traction.
Why does the Caralogy 0-100 differ from the manufacturer?
The 0,2 s gap falls within the normal variability of performance measurements. Lap times vary depending on test conditions, the specific vehicle tested and the measurement protocol.
What is the power-to-weight ratio of the Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1?
At 1 579 kg for 150 hp, the ratio is 10.5 kg/hp.
Is the Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1 fast for its segment?
Check the Benchmark section to see how the Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1 compares to other vehicles in its segment.