Among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus) ranks 19th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.5 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 29th of 33 in Top speed (282 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 30th of 33 in Power-to-weight (233 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).
Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus)
350 hp, 4,5 s 0-100 : among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus) ranks 19th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 29th of 33 in Top speed, 30th of 33 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
350hp
390 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.5s
VMax 282 km/h
Cons.
11.3L
/100 km
Tank
67.001757L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- Boxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
- Displacement
- 3,614 cm³
- Puissance thermique
- 350 hp
- Combined power
- 350 hp
- Combined torque
- 390 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage Automatique
- Transmission
- Propulsion
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 11.3 L/100 km
- Tank
- 67.001757 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,5 s
- VMax
- 282 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,466 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,350 mm
- Width
- 1,852 mm
- Height
- 1,310 mm
- Boot
- 7 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,500 kg
- Cd
- 0.3
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 33 S, the 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus) ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 4.5 s 0-100 (19th of 33 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus) ranks 19th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 1.6 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).
Top speed: 282 km/h (29th of 33 in Top speed)
Top speed of 282 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus) stands against S
Comparison across 33 S marketed between 2009–2013.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus)
Continue with the Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus)
The same car, from other angles.
Consumption
Consumption and annual running cost of the Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus)Motorway
Simulated motorway trip of the Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus): stops and durationPerformance
Performance of the Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus): 0-100 and lap times
Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus): what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 4.5 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 Carrera 4 (PDK w/Sport Chrono Package Plus) vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.