991.1 · GENERATION 2011 · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE

911 GT3

441 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 GT3 ranks 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 10th of 33 in Top speed, 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate4,32715,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

441hp

430 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.1s

VMax 310 km/h

Cons.

14.3L

/100 km

Tank

67.001757L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche 911 GT3

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureBoxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement3,800 cm³
Puissance thermique441 hp
Combined power441 hp
Combined torque430 Nm
GearboxManuelle Manuelle
TransmissionPropulsion

Consumption

Cons. WLTP14.3 L/100km
Tank67.001757 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,1 s
VMax310 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,481 mm
Wheelbase2,355 mm
Width1,808 mm
Height1,280 mm
Boot4 L
Kerb weight1,395 kg
Cd0.32

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 33 S, the 911 GT3 ranks (top 10 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 10th of 33 in Top speed (310 km/h), 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight (316 hp/t). 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 10th of 33 in Top speed (310 km/h), 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight (316 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,3 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 2.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the 911 GT3 ranks 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 1.2 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).

Top speed: 310 km/h (10th of 33 in Top speed)

Top speed of 310 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the 911 GT3 stands against S

Comparison across 33 S marketed between 2009–2013.

0–100 km/h10e / 33
4,1 s
Min 5,0 s · Porsche Cayman S (Manual)Max 2,9 s · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Top speed10e / 33
310 km/h
Min 275 km/h · Porsche Cayman S (PDK)Max 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador LP700
Power-to-weight8e / 33
316 hp/t
Min 226 hp/t · Porsche 911 Carrera 4 (Manual)Max 444 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador LP700

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the 911 GT3

Frequently asked questions

Porsche 911 GT3: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 GT3 ranks 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 10th of 33 in Top speed (310 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight (316 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 GT3 vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.