Porsche 911 GT3
441 hp, 4,1 s 0-100 : among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 GT3 ranks 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 10th of 33 in Top speed, 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador LP700. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 441 hp
- 430 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.1 s
- VMax 310 km/h
- Cons.
- 14.3 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 67.001757 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- Boxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
- Displacement
- 3,800 cm³
- ICE power
- 441 hp
- Combined power
- 441 hp
- Combined torque
- 430 Nm
- Gearbox
- Manuelle Manuelle
- Transmission
- Propulsion
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 14.3 L/100 km
- Tank
- 67.001757 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,1 s
- VMax
- 310 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,481 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,355 mm
- Width
- 1,808 mm
- Height
- 1,280 mm
- Boot
- 4 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,395 kg
- Cd
- 0.32
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 33 S, the 911 GT3 ranks (top 10 in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 10th of 33 in Top speed (310 km/h), 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight (316 hp/t). 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s), 10th of 33 in Top speed (310 km/h), 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight (316 hp/t).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 14,3 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 2.9 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (1st with 350 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.1 s 0-100 (10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 911 GT3 ranks 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h, 1.2 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador LP700 (2.9 s).
Top speed: 310 km/h (10th of 33 in Top speed)
Top speed of 310 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 911 GT3 stands against S
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 911 GT3
Continue with the Porsche 911 GT3
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche 911 GT3: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 911 GT3 rank in its segment?
Among the 33 S 2009–2013, the 911 GT3 ranks 10th of 33 in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 10th of 33 in Top speed (310 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700), 8th of 33 in Power-to-weight (316 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador LP700).
How much does the 911 GT3 cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Lamborghini Aventador LP700 instead?
The Lamborghini Aventador LP700 leads in 0–100 km/h (2.9 s vs 4.1 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 911 GT3 vs Lamborghini Aventador LP700 duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.