958.1 · GENERATION 2014 · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE

Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition

243 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 22 E-SUV 2012–2016, the Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition ranks 6th of 22 in Combined consumption, 17th of 21 in Tank range, 19th of 22 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate3,35115,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

243hp

550 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.3s

VMax 217 km/h

Cons.

10.2L

/100 km

Tank

26.4L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Porsche Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureV · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique
Displacement2,967 cm³
Puissance thermique243 hp
Combined power243 hp
Combined torque550 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10.2 L/100km
Tank26.4 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,3 s
VMax217 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,846 mm
Wheelbase2,896 mm
Width1,938 mm
Height1,712 mm
Boot24 L
Kerb weight2,175 kg
Cd0.36

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 22 E-SUV, the Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition ranks (top 6 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

E-SUV among the best in segment: 6th of 22 in Combined consumption (10.2 L/100).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 7.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (1st with 1265 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 10.2 L/100 L/100 (6th of 22 in Combined consumption)

The Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition consumes 10.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (7.9 L/100).

Tank range: 259 km (17th of 21 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition covers 259 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1265 km.

Segment positioning

Where the Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 22 E-SUV marketed between 2012–2016.

Combined consumption6e / 22
10.2 L/100
Min 13.8 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne TurboMax 7.9 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
Tank range17e / 21
259 km
Min 213 km · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 1 265 km · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
0–100 km/h19e / 22
7,3 s
Min 7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 3,9 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo S

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Compare

Popular duels involving the Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition

Frequently asked questions

Porsche Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 22 E-SUV 2012–2016, the Cayenne Diesel Platinum Edition ranks 6th of 22 in Combined consumption (10.2 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 17th of 21 in Tank range (259 km, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 19th of 22 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo S).

259 km on a full tank (10.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 17th of 21 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.