Among the 21 E-SUV 2019–2023, the X5 xDrive25d ranks 1st of 20 in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive25d), 1st of 19 in Tank range (1290 km, behind the Bmw X5 xDrive25d), 21th of 21 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT).
G05 · GENERATION 2021 → · LARGE SUV
BMWICE
X5 xDrive25d
231 hp, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 21 E-SUV 2019–2023, the X5 xDrive25d ranks 1st of 20 in Combined consumption, 1st of 19 in Tank range, 21th of 21 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
231hp
450 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.5s
VMax 222 km/h
Cons.
6.2L
/100 km
Tank
80L
Technical identity card
Full specifications BMW X5 xDrive25d
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | 4 cyl. |
| Displacement | 1,995 cm³ |
| Power | 231 hp |
| Couple | 450 Nm |
| Gearbox | Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 6.2 L/100km |
| Tank | 80 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,5 s |
| VMax | 222 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,922 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,975 mm |
| Width | 2,004 mm |
| Height | 1,745 mm |
| Boot | 650 L |
| Kerb weight | 2,070 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 163 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 21 E-SUV, the X5 xDrive25d ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
E-SUV among the best in segment: 1st of 20 in Combined consumption (6.2 L/100), 1st of 19 in Tank range (1290 km).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 3.2 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.2 L/100 L/100 (1st of 20 in Combined consumption)
The X5 xDrive25d consumes 6.2 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X5 xDrive25d (6.2 L/100).
Tank range: 1290 km (1st of 19 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X5 xDrive25d covers 1290 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1290 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the X5 xDrive25d stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 21 E-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.
Combined consumption1e / 20
6.2 L/100
Min 13.7 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Turbo CoupeMax 6.2 L/100 · Bmw X5 xDrive25d
Tank range1e / 19
1 290 km
Min 173 km · Porsche Cayenne Turbo CoupeMax 1 290 km · Bmw X5 xDrive25d
0–100 km/h21e / 21
7,5 s
Min 7,5 s · Bmw X5 xDrive25dMax 3,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q7 SUV231 hp · 0-100 7.1 s
Q7 SUV231 hp · 0-100 7.1 s
Q8 SUV231 hp · 0-100 7.1 s
Cayenne Diesel243 hp · 0-100 7.3 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full BMW X5 G05 range
Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G05
Compare
Popular duels involving the X5 xDrive25d
Frequently asked questions
BMW X5 xDrive25d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1290 km on a full tank (6.2 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 1st of 19 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.