Among the 23 E-SUV 2011–2015, the Cayenne V6 ranks 13th of 23 in Combined consumption (13.1 L/100, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 13th of 22 in Tank range (647 km, behind the Porsche Cayenne Diesel), 13th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo).
958.1 · GENERATION 2013 → · LARGE SUV
PorscheICE
Cayenne V6
304 hp, 7,2 s 0-100 : among the 23 E-SUV 2011–2015, the Cayenne V6 ranks 13th of 23 in Combined consumption, 13th of 22 in Tank range, 13th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
304hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.2s
VMax 230 km/h
Cons.
13.1L
/100 km
Tank
84.793184L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche Cayenne V6
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,598 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 304 hp |
| Combined power | 304 hp |
| Combined torque | 400 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 8 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Integrale (AWD) |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 13.1 L/100km |
| Tank | 84.793184 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,2 s |
| VMax | 230 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,846 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,896 mm |
| Width | 1,938 mm |
| Height | 1,699 mm |
| Boot | 63 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,995 kg |
| Cd | 0.36 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 23 E-SUV, the Cayenne V6 ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Fuel consumption: 13.1 L/100 L/100 (13th of 23 in Combined consumption)
The Cayenne V6 consumes 13.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Porsche Cayenne Diesel (7.9 L/100).
Tank range: 647 km (13th of 22 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the Cayenne V6 covers 647 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1265 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the Cayenne V6 stands against E-SUV
Comparison across 23 E-SUV marketed between 2011–2015.
Combined consumption13e / 23
13.1 L/100
Min 13.8 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne TurboMax 7.9 L/100 · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
Tank range13e / 22
647 km
Min 213 km · Porsche Cayenne Platinum EditionMax 1 265 km · Porsche Cayenne Diesel
0–100 km/h13e / 23
7,2 s
Min 7,5 s · Porsche Cayenne (8-speed Tiptronic S)Max 4,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q7 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
Q8 SUV340 hp · 0-100 5.6 s
X5 xDrive40i340 hp · 0-100 5.5 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Compare
Popular duels involving the Cayenne V6
Frequently asked questions
Porsche Cayenne V6: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
647 km on a full tank (13.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 13th of 22 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Porsche Cayenne Diesel leads in Combined consumption (7.9 L/100 vs 13.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Cayenne V6 vs Porsche Cayenne Diesel duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.