G05 · GENERATION 2021 · LARGE SUV
BMWICE

X5 M50i

530 hp, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 19 E-SUV 2019–2023, the X5 M50i ranks 10th of 19 in 0–100 km/h, 14th of 19 in Top speed, 7th of 19 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate2,81215,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

530hp

750 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

4.3s

VMax 250 km/h

Cons.

10.9L

/100 km

Tank

83L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X5 M50i

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 8 cyl.
Displacement4,395 cm\u00b3
Power530 hp
Couple750 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionX5 M50i

Consumption

Cons. WLTP10,9 L/100km
Tank83 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h4,3 s
VMax250 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,922 mm
Wheelbase2,975 mm
Width2,004 mm
Height1,745 mm
Boot650 L
Kerb weight2,260 kg
Cd0.35
CO₂ WLTP251 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 19 E-SUV, the X5 M50i ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

Demanding drivers: 7th of 19 in Power-to-weight (235 hp/t). 7th of 19 in Power-to-weight (235 hp/t).

Less suitable for

Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 10,9 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 3.2 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (1st with 299 km/h) takes the lead.

Acceleration: 4.3 s 0-100 (10th of 19 in 0–100 km/h)

In pure acceleration, the X5 M50i ranks 10th of 19 in 0–100 km/h, 1.1 s off the reference Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT (3.2 s).

Top speed: 250 km/h (14th of 19 in Top speed)

Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 299 km/h.

Segment positioning

Where the X5 M50i stands against E-SUV

Comparison across 19 E-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.

0–100 km/h

10eout of 19

4,3 s
Min6,8 s · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Max3,2 s · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT

Top speed

14eout of 19

250 km/h
Min220 km/h · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Max299 km/h · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT

Power-to-weight

7eout of 19

235 hp/t
Min149 hp/t · Ford Explorer EcoBoost 300
Max282 hp/t · Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X5 G05 range

Generation G05 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G05

Compare

Popular duels involving the X5 M50i

Take the next step

Find a X5 M50i or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X5 M50i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X5 M50i rank in its segment?#

Among the 19 E-SUV 2019–2023, the X5 M50i ranks 10th of 19 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 14th of 19 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT), 7th of 19 in Power-to-weight (235 hp/t, behind the Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT).

How much does the X5 M50i cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT instead?#

The Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT leads in 0–100 km/h (3.2 s vs 4.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X5 M50i vs Porsche Cayenne Turbo GT duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.