BMW 223i xDrive Active Tourer
218 hp, 6,9 s 0-100 : among the 2 M hybrid 2020–2024, the 223i xDrive Active Tourer ranks Combined consumption, Tank range, 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 218 hp
- 360 Nm, dont 19 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6.9 s
- VMax 238 km/h
- Cons.
- 7.1 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 45 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Electric power
- 19 hp
- Combined power
- 218 hp
- Couple
- 360 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 7.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 45 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 6,9 s
- VMax
- 238 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,386 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,670 mm
- Width
- 1,824 mm
- Height
- 1,576 mm
- Boot
- 415 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,615 kg
- Cd
- 0.27
- CO₂ WLTP
- 161 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 2 M hybrid, the 223i xDrive Active Tourer ranks in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 0–100 km/h (6.9 s).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 220d Active Tourer (1st with 4.9 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 220d Active Tourer (1st with 918 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 7.1 L/100 L/100 (Combined consumption)
The 223i xDrive Active Tourer consumes 7.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 220d Active Tourer (4.9 L/100).
Tank range: 634 km (Tank range)
On a full tank, the 223i xDrive Active Tourer covers 634 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 918 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 223i xDrive Active Tourer stands against M hybrid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 2 Series G42 range
Generation G42 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G42
Popular duels involving the 223i xDrive Active Tourer
Continue with the BMW 223i xDrive Active Tourer
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 223i xDrive Active Tourer: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 223i xDrive Active Tourer rank in its segment?
Among the 2 M hybrid 2020–2024, the 223i xDrive Active Tourer ranks Combined consumption (7.1 L/100, behind the BMW 220d Active Tourer), Tank range (634 km, behind the BMW 220d Active Tourer), 0–100 km/h (6.9 s, behind the BMW 223i xDrive Active Tourer).
What is the range of the 223i xDrive Active Tourer?
634 km on a full tank (7.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - Tank range.
How much does the 223i xDrive Active Tourer cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 220d Active Tourer instead?
The BMW 220d Active Tourer leads in Combined consumption (4.9 L/100 vs 7.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 223i xDrive Active Tourer vs BMW 220d Active Tourer duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.