Among the 13 compacts 2020–2024, the M240i Coupé ranks 7th of 13 in 0–100 km/h (4.7 s, behind the BMW M2), 11th of 13 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the BMW M2), 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight (229 hp/t, behind the BMW M2).
BMW M240i Coupé
374 hp, 4,7 s 0-100 : among the 13 compacts 2020–2024, the M240i Coupé ranks 7th of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 11th of 13 in Top speed, 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight, behind the only BMW M2. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
374hp
500 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.7s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
8.2L
/100 km
Tank
52L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 2,998 cm³
- Power
- 374 hp
- Couple
- 500 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 8.2 L/100 km
- Tank
- 52 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,7 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,548 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,741 mm
- Width
- 1,838 mm
- Height
- 1,397 mm
- Boot
- 390 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,635 kg
- Cd
- 0.26
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 13 compacts, the M240i Coupé ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Demanding drivers: 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight (229 hp/t). 2nd of 13 in Power-to-weight (229 hp/t).
Less suitable for
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 8,2 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M2 (1st with 4.1 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the BMW M2 (1st with 285 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.7 s 0-100 (7th of 13 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the M240i Coupé ranks 7th of 13 in 0–100 km/h, 0.6 s off the reference BMW M2 (4.1 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (11th of 13 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 285 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the M240i Coupé stands against compacts
Comparison across 13 compacts marketed between 2020–2024.
0–100 km/h7e / 13
4,7 s
Min 5,6 s · Volkswagen Golf 8 GTI ClubsportMax 4,1 s · BMW M2
Top speed11e / 13
250 km/h
Min 220 km/h · Toyota GR Corolla Circuit EditionMax 285 km/h · BMW M2
Power-to-weight2e / 13
229 hp/t
Min 195 hp/t · Bmw M235i xDrive Gran CoupeMax 266 hp/t · BMW M2
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
PetrolAudi RS 3 Sedan400 hp · 3.8 sPetrolAudi RS 3 Sportback400 hp · 3.8 sPetrolAudi S3 Sedan333 hp · 4.7 sPetrolAudi S3 Sportback333 hp · 4.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 2 Series G42 range
Generation G42 launched in 2022. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G42
Popular duels involving the M240i Coupé
BMW M240i Coupé: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The BMW M2 leads in 0–100 km/h (4.1 s vs 4.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the M240i Coupé vs BMW M2 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.