Audi A5 Avant
204 hp, 7,7 s 0-100 : among the 23 saloons 2024–2028, the A5 Avant ranks 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption, 2nd of 23 in Tank range, 17th of 23 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 204 hp
- 400 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.7 s
- VMax 240 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 60 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,968 cm³
- Power
- 204 hp
- Couple
- 400 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Traction
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 60 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,7 s
- VMax
- 240 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,829 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,897 mm
- Width
- 1,860 mm
- Height
- 1,424 mm
- Boot
- 448 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,835 kg
- Cd
- 0.28
- CO₂ WLTP
- 146 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 23 saloons, the A5 Avant ranks (top 3 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100), 2nd of 23 in Tank range (1071 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 320d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi A5 Sedan (1st with 1091 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.6 L/100 L/100 (3rd of 23 in Combined consumption)
The A5 Avant consumes 5.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 320d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1071 km (2nd of 23 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the A5 Avant covers 1071 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1091 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the A5 Avant stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi A5 9F range
Generation 9F launched in 2024. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 9F
Popular duels involving the A5 Avant
Continue with the Audi A5 Avant
The same car, from other angles.
Audi A5 Avant: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the A5 Avant rank in its segment?
Among the 23 saloons 2024–2028, the A5 Avant ranks 3rd of 23 in Combined consumption (5.6 L/100, behind the BMW 320d), 2nd of 23 in Tank range (1071 km, behind the Audi A5 Sedan), 17th of 23 in 0–100 km/h (7.7 s, behind the BMW M4 Competition M xDrive).
What is the range of the A5 Avant?
1071 km on a full tank (5.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 2nd of 23 in Tank range.
How much does the A5 Avant cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 320d instead?
The BMW 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A5 Avant vs BMW 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.