BMW 318d Steptronic
148 hp, 9,2 s 0-100 : among the 14 saloons hybrid 2016–2020, the 318d Steptronic ranks 2nd of 14 in Combined consumption, 1st of 14 in Tank range, 14th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 148 hp
- 320 Nm, dont 11 hp elec
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9.2 s
- VMax 212 km/h
- Cons.
- 4.1 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,995 cm³
- Electric power
- 11 hp
- Combined power
- 148 hp
- Couple
- 320 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 4.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 9,2 s
- VMax
- 212 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,709 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,851 mm
- Width
- 1,827 mm
- Height
- 1,435 mm
- Boot
- 480 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,430 kg
- Cd
- 0.26
- CO₂ WLTP
- 107 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 saloons hybrid, the 318d Steptronic ranks (top 2 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage. 2nd of 14 in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100), 1st of 14 in Tank range (1439 km).
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 320d (1st with 4.1 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the BMW M340i xDrive (1st with 4.4 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.1 L/100 L/100 (2nd of 14 in Combined consumption)
The 318d Steptronic consumes 4.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 320d (4.1 L/100).
Tank range: 1439 km (1st of 14 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 318d Steptronic covers 1439 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1439 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 318d Steptronic stands against saloons hybrid
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 318d Steptronic
Continue with the BMW 318d Steptronic
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 318d Steptronic: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 318d Steptronic rank in its segment?
Among the 14 saloons hybrid 2016–2020, the 318d Steptronic ranks 2nd of 14 in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100, behind the BMW 320d), 1st of 14 in Tank range (1439 km, behind the BMW 318d Steptronic), 14th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (9.2 s, behind the BMW M340i xDrive).
What is the range of the 318d Steptronic?
1439 km on a full tank (4.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 14 in Tank range.
How much does the 318d Steptronic cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 320d instead?
The BMW 320d leads in Combined consumption (4.1 L/100 vs 4.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 318d Steptronic vs BMW 320d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.